淺談:深.淺拷貝與copy.strong
深.淺拷貝
- copy mutableCopy NSString
NSString *string = @"漢斯哈哈哈";
// 沒有產生新對象
NSString *copyString = [string copy];
// 產生新對象
NSMutableString *mutableCopyString = [string mutableCopy];
NSLog(@"string = %p copyString = %p mutableCopyString = %p", string, copyString, mutableCopyString);
- copy mutableCopy NSMutableString
NSMutableString *string = [NSMutableString stringWithString:@"漢斯哈哈哈"];
// 產生新對象
NSString *copyString = [string copy];
// 產生新對象
NSMutableString *mutableCopyString = [string mutableCopy];
NSLog(@"string = %p copyString = %p mutableCopyString = %p", string, copyString, mutableCopyString);
結論:
注意:其他對象NSArray、NSMutableArray 、NSDictionary、NSMutableDictionary一樣適用
- copy NSObject
HSPerson *p = [[HSPerson alloc] init];
p.age = 20;
p.height = 170.0;
HSPerson *copyP = [p copy]; // 這裏崩潰
崩潰:
看崩潰信息HSPerson應該先實現:
- (id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone;
測試:
#import "HSPerson.h"
@interface HSPerson()<NSCopying>
@end
@implementation HSPerson
- (id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone
{
return @"漢斯哈哈哈";
}
@end
HSPerson *p = [[HSPerson alloc] init];
p.age = 20;
p.height = 170.0;
HSPerson *copyP = [p copy];
NSLog(@"copyP: %@", copyP);
可以看出copyWithZone重新分配新的內存空間,則:
- (id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone
{
HSPerson *person = [[HSPerson allocWithZone:zone] init];
return person;
// 有些人可能下面alloc,重新初始化空間,但這方法已給你分配了zone,自己就無需再次alloc內存空間了
// HSPerson *person = [[HSPerson alloc] init];
}
HSPerson *p = [[HSPerson alloc] init];
p.age = 20;
p.height = 170.0;
HSPerson *copyP = [p copy];
NSLog(@"p = %p copyP = %p", p, copyP);
NSLog(@"age = %d height = %f", copyP.age, copyP.height);
雖然copy了份新的對象,然而age,height值並未copy,那麼:
- (id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone
{
HSPerson *person = [[HSPerson allocWithZone:zone] init];
person.age = self.age;
person.height = self.height;
// 這裏self其實就要被copy的那個對象,很顯然要自己賦值給新對象,所以這裏可以控制copy的屬性
return person;
}
這時你會想,有NSMutableCopying?沒錯,是有這貨:
- (id)mutableCopyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone
{
HSPerson *person = [[HSPerson allocWithZone:zone] init];
person.age = self.age;
person.height = self.height;
return person;
}
NSCopying、NSMutableCopying有啥區別?
其實感覺沒必要有NSMutableCopying,因爲壓根就沒可變的HSPerson,但如果該對象有其他行爲,可以借用NSMutableCopying實現,哈哈哈
copy.strong
說完深淺拷貝,理解copy.strong就輕鬆多了!
- copy
#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
@interface HSPerson : NSObject
@property (nonatomic, copy) NSString *name;
@end
NSMutableString *string = [NSMutableString stringWithFormat:@"漢斯哈哈哈"];
HSPerson *person = [[HSPerson alloc] init];
person.name = string;
// 不能改變person.name的值,因爲其內部copy新的對象
[string appendString:@" hans"];
NSLog(@"name = %@", person.name);
property copy 實際上就對name幹了這個:
- (void)setName:(NSString *)name
{
_name = [name copy];
}
假設name爲NSMutableString,會發生什麼事?
@property (nonatomic, copy) NSMutableString *name;
這樣會捱罵哦,實際上內部還是:
- (void)setName:(NSMutableString *)name
{
_name = [name copy];
}
copy出來的仍然是不可變字符!如果有人用NSMutableString的方法,就會崩潰:
- strong
@property (nonatomic, strong) NSString *name;
NSMutableString *string = [NSMutableString stringWithFormat:@"漢斯哈哈哈"];
HSPerson *person = [[HSPerson alloc] init];
person.name = string;
// 可以改變person.name的值,因爲其內部沒有生成新的對象
[string appendString:@" hans"];
NSLog(@"name = %@", person.name);
總結:用copy與strong取決於需求,如果不希望被外界更改用copy,反之用strong