原文：end-to-end argument and fate sharing
翻譯：端到端的論點和命運共享
問題：直譯
建議：端到端的原則 和 命運共擔 (或者“端到端原則 和 fate sharing”，fate sharing就 當作術語別去翻譯了，非常彆扭）
依據1：
在wiki查詢end-to-end argument會自動重定向到end-to-end principle，雖然不能作爲一個非常有力的證據，但是體現了一種思路，end-to-end是一種設計原則，而不是設計論點，這是無需爭論的。
End-to-end argument
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Redirect page
End-to-end principle
The end-to-end principle is a design framework in computer networking. In networks designed according to this principle, application-specific features reside in the communicating end nodes of the network, rather than in intermediary nodes, such as gateways and routers, that exist to establish the network.
“端到端原則”是計算機網絡中的一種設計框架。根據此原則設計的網絡，特定的功能存在於網絡中通信的終端。而不是在中間節點，例如網關和路由器這些組成網絡的設備。
依據2：
Fate-sharing在書中翻譯爲命運共享，這個表述似乎在這裏不太恰當。
wiki 對fate-sharing的解釋
Fate-sharing is an engineering design philosophy where related parts of a system are yoked together, so that they either fail together or not at all. Fate-sharing is an example of the end-to-end principle. The term "fate-sharing" was defined by David D. Clark in his 1988 paper "The Design Philosophy of the DARPA Internet Protocols"as follows:
The fate-sharing model suggests that it is acceptable to lose the state information associated with an entity if, at the same time, the entity itself is lost. Specifically, information about transport level synchronization is stored in the host which is attached to the net and using its communication service.
A good example of fate-sharing is the transmission of routing messages in routing protocols such as BGP, where the failure of a link or link interface automatically has the effect of terminating routing announcements through that interface, ultimately resulting in the tearing down of the state for that route at each end of the link. Similar considerations apply to TCP.