/*
* ORACLE PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to license terms.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*/
/*
*
*
*
*
*
* Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166
* Expert Group and released to the public domain, as explained at
* http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
*/
package java.util.concurrent.locks;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Date;
import sun.misc.Unsafe;
/**
* Provides a framework for implementing blocking locks and related
* synchronizers (semaphores, events, etc) that rely on
* first-in-first-out (FIFO) wait queues. This class is designed to
* be a useful basis for most kinds of synchronizers that rely on a
* single atomic {@code int} value to represent state. Subclasses
* must define the protected methods that change this state, and which
* define what that state means in terms of this object being acquired
* or released. Given these, the other methods in this class carry
* out all queuing and blocking mechanics. Subclasses can maintain
* other state fields, but only the atomically updated {@code int}
* value manipulated using methods {@link #getState}, {@link
* #setState} and {@link #compareAndSetState} is tracked with respect
* to synchronization.
* 提供阻塞鎖和依賴先進先出等待隊列的同步器的框架。這個類的被設計爲用來作爲大多數同步器的基礎類
* 依賴一個獨立的原子量去代表一個狀態。子類必須定義protected方式去修改state，定義狀態在這個對象中的含義是獲取或釋放。
* 考慮到這些，在這個類的其他方法攜帶取消所有隊列和阻塞的機制。子類能保持其他狀態字段，但是隻能以原子的方式更新值使用方法
* getState,setState和compareAndSetState關於同步的跟蹤。
*
*
* <p>Subclasses should be defined as non-public internal helper
* classes that are used to implement the synchronization properties
* of their enclosing class. Class
* {@code AbstractQueuedSynchronizer} does not implement any
* synchronization interface. Instead it defines methods such as
* {@link #acquireInterruptibly} that can be invoked as
* appropriate by concrete locks and related synchronizers to
* implement their public methods.
* 子類（那些被用來實現他們封閉類的同步屬性）應該被定義爲非公有的內部幫手類
* AbstractQueuedSynchronizer沒有實現任何同步的接口，反而它定義瞭如acquireInterruptibly這樣
* 可以通過具體鎖佔用被調用和相關同步器去實現他們的public方法。
*
*
* <p>This class supports either or both a default <em>exclusive</em>
* mode and a <em>shared</em> mode. When acquired in exclusive mode,
* attempted acquires by other threads cannot succeed. Shared mode
* acquires by multiple threads may (but need not) succeed. This class
* does not "understand" these differences except in the
* mechanical sense that when a shared mode acquire succeeds, the next
* waiting thread (if one exists) must also determine whether it can
* acquire as well. Threads waiting in the different modes share the
* same FIFO queue. Usually, implementation subclasses support only
* one of these modes, but both can come into play for example in a
* {@link ReadWriteLock}. Subclasses that support only exclusive or
* only shared modes need not define the methods supporting the unused mode.
* 這個類可以同時提供一個默認的獨有的模式和共享模式。當acquired在獨佔模式，
* 其他線程的企圖acquires是不能成功的。共享模式被多線程acquires可能（不是必須）成功。
* 這個類不能明白這些不同除非在機械量當一個共享模式acquire成功，下一個等待線程（如果存在）
* 必須也確認是否能acquire成功。在不同模式下等待的線程共享相同的FIFO隊列。
* 通常，子類只實現一個模式，但是也可以都實現能發揮作用，比如ReadWriteLock。
* 只支持獨佔或只支持共享模式的子類，不需要定義該模式沒有使用的方法。
*
* <p>This class defines a nested {@link ConditionObject} class that
* can be used as a {@link Condition} implementation by subclasses
* supporting exclusive mode for which method {@link
* #isHeldExclusively} reports whether synchronization is exclusively
* held with respect to the current thread, method {@link #release}
* invoked with the current {@link #getState} value fully releases
* this object, and {@link #acquire}, given this saved state value,
* eventually restores this object to its previous acquired state. No
* {@code AbstractQueuedSynchronizer} method otherwise creates such a
* condition, so if this constraint cannot be met, do not use it. The
* behavior of {@link ConditionObject} depends of course on the
* semantics of its synchronizer implementation.
* 這個類定義了一個ConditionObject的內部類，它被用來作爲一個 Condition 實現通過子類
* 支持獨佔模式方法isHeldExclusively（）記錄不論同步是獨佔當前線程的記錄,方法release被
* 調用和當前getState（）的值充分釋放這個對象，並且給定這個保存狀態值，最終恢復這個對象到acquired
* 前的狀態。沒有AbstractQueuedSynchronizer方法另外創建一個狀態。因此，如果這個條件不能被匹配，不要
* 使用它。ConditionObject的行爲取決於同步器實現的語義
*
*
*
*
* <p>This class provides inspection, instrumentation, and monitoring
* methods for the internal queue, as well as similar methods for
* condition objects. These can be exported as desired into classes
* using an {@code AbstractQueuedSynchronizer} for their
* synchronization mechanics.
* 這個類爲內部的隊列提供檢查，監視的方法。和爲狀態提供的方法類似。
* 這個可以根據他們的同步器機制去導出AbstractQueuedSynchronizer他們期望的
*
* <p>Serialization of this class stores only the underlying atomic
* integer maintaining state, so deserialized objects have empty
* thread queues. Typical subclasses requiring serializability will
* define a {@code readObject} method that restores this to a known
* initial state upon deserialization.
*
*
* <h3>Usage</h3>
* 使用
* <p>To use this class as the basis of a synchronizer, redefine the
* following methods, as applicable, by inspecting and/or modifying
* the synchronization state using {@link #getState}, {@link
* #setState} and/or {@link #compareAndSetState}:
* 同時用這個類作爲基礎的同步器，重新定義下面的方法，作爲合適的，通過檢查和/或 修改
* 同步器的狀態使用getState，setState，compareAndSetState
* <ul>
* <li> {@link #tryAcquire}
* <li> {@link #tryRelease}
* <li> {@link #tryAcquireShared}
* <li> {@link #tryReleaseShared}
* <li> {@link #isHeldExclusively}
* </ul>
*
* Each of these methods by default throws {@link
* UnsupportedOperationException}. Implementations of these methods
* must be internally thread-safe, and should in general be short and
* not block. Defining these methods is the <em>only</em> supported
* means of using this class. All other methods are declared
* {@code final} because they cannot be independently varied.
* 這些方法默認拋出UnsupportedOperationException異常，實現這些方法必須內部的線程安全。
* 並且一般是短並且非阻塞的。定義這些方法時不止支持使用這個類的含義，所有其他方法時定義爲final
* 因爲他們不能被獨立變化，（也就是這幾個方法有相互的關聯和影響，需要配套的使用）。
*
*
* <p>You may also find the inherited methods from {@link
* AbstractOwnableSynchronizer} useful to keep track of the thread
* owning an exclusive synchronizer. You are encouraged to use them
* -- this enables monitoring and diagnostic tools to assist users in
* determining which threads hold locks.
* 你可能也發現從AbstractOwnableSynchronizer繼承的方法對保持線程擁
* 有一個獨佔的同步器的蹤跡是有用的。你被鼓勵去使用他們。這能監控和診斷工具去幫助使用者
* 確定那些線程持有鎖。
*
*
* <p>Even though this class is based on an internal FIFO queue, it
* does not automatically enforce FIFO acquisition policies. The core
* of exclusive synchronization takes the form:
* 及時這個類基於內部的FIFO隊列，它不能自動的實施FIFO的獲取策略。
* 它的核心是獨佔同步模式
* <pre>
* 獲取：
* Acquire:
* tryAcquire：失敗
* while (!tryAcquire(arg)) {
* 排隊線程如果它沒有被排隊
* <em>enqueue thread if it is not already queued</em>;
* 可能阻塞當前線程
* <em>possibly block current thread</em>;
* }
*釋放：
* Release:
* 嘗試釋放
* if (tryRelease(arg))
* 解除隊列第一個線程的鎖
* <em>unblock the first queued thread</em>;
* </pre>
* 共享模式是類似的但是可能包含級聯信號
* (Shared mode is similar but may involve cascading signals.)
*
* <p id="barging">Because checks in acquire are invoked before
* enqueuing, a newly acquiring thread may <em>barge</em> ahead of
* others that are blocked and queued. However, you can, if desired,
* define {@code tryAcquire} and/or {@code tryAcquireShared} to
* disable barging by internally invoking one or more of the inspection
* methods, thereby providing a <em>fair</em> FIFO acquisition order.
* In particular, most fair synchronizers can define {@code tryAcquire}
* to return {@code false} if {@link #hasQueuedPredecessors} (a method
* specifically designed to be used by fair synchronizers) returns
* {@code true}. Other variations are possible.
* 因爲在acquire中的檢查調用在入隊之前，一個新的請求線程可能搶佔到其他阻塞或在隊列的線程
* 然而，你能，如果期望。定義tryAcquire和tryAcquireShared去使搶佔無效通過內部調用一個或多個
* 檢查方法，從而提供一個公平的FIFO請求清單。特別說明，大多數公平的同步器能定義tryAcquire
* 去返回false，如果hasQueuedPredecessors（一個方法明確的定義一個能使用公平同步器）
* 返回true,其他變化也是可能的。
*
*
*
*
* <p>Throughput and scalability are generally highest for the
* default barging (also known as <em>greedy</em>,
* <em>renouncement</em>, and <em>convoy-avoidance</em>) strategy.
* While this is not guaranteed to be fair or starvation-free, earlier
* queued threads are allowed to recontend before later queued
* threads, and each recontention has an unbiased chance to succeed
* against incoming threads. Also, while acquires do not
* "spin" in the usual sense, they may perform multiple
* invocations of {@code tryAcquire} interspersed with other
* computations before blocking. This gives most of the benefits of
* spins when exclusive synchronization is only briefly held, without
* most of the liabilities when it isn't. If so desired, you can
* augment this by preceding calls to acquire methods with
* "fast-path" checks, possibly prechecking {@link #hasContended}
* and/or {@link #hasQueuedThreads} to only do so if the synchronizer
* is likely not to be contended.
* 非公平可以保證很高的吞吐量和伸縮性，但不能保證公平和無飢餓。
* 允許先前排隊的線程在稍後排隊的線程之前重新調度，並且重新進入的線程有一個公平的機會
*
* （早期隊列線程是在延遲線程隊列之前允許重新整理，每個重新整理
* 有一個公平的機會去從針對進入的線程）。當請求沒有空轉。通常意義上說，tryAcquire在
* 阻塞之前會進行多次調用。空轉對只是短時間的獨佔同步器有很大的益處。
* 如果和預期一樣，你可以通過先前調用acquire方法來增加此值以便使用fast-path檢查，
* 可能預檢查hasContended hasQueuedThreads只有當同步器不會發生競爭。
*
*
* <p>This class provides an efficient and scalable basis for
* synchronization in part by specializing its range of use to
* synchronizers that can rely on {@code int} state, acquire, and
* release parameters, and an internal FIFO wait queue. When this does
* not suffice, you can build synchronizers from a lower level using
* {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic atomic} classes, your own custom
* {@link java.util.Queue} classes, and {@link LockSupport} blocking
* support.
*
* 這個類提供一個高效的可擴展的基礎同步的部分方法是將其使用範圍專門化到可以依賴於int state,獲取，
* 和釋放參數，內部的FIFO等待隊列，當這個不能滿足，你可以構建一個同步器 從一個低等級使用原子類，
* 你擁有定製的隊列類和阻塞的支持。
*
*
* <h3>Usage Examples</h3>
*
* <p>Here is a non-reentrant mutual exclusion lock class that uses
* the value zero to represent the unlocked state, and one to
* represent the locked state. While a non-reentrant lock
* does not strictly require recording of the current owner
* thread, this class does so anyway to make usage easier to monitor.
* It also supports conditions and exposes
* one of the instrumentation methods:
* 這是一個非重入共享的排他鎖類使用0代表沒有鎖定的狀態，1代表鎖定的狀態。
* 一個非重入鎖不嚴格要求記錄當前線程的所有者（因爲不可重入），無論如何，這個類
* 讓使用更簡單地去監控，它也支持條件和公開。
* <pre> {@code
* class Mutex implements Lock, java.io.Serializable {
*
* // Our internal helper class
* private static class Sync extends AbstractQueuedSynchronizer {
* // Reports whether in locked state
* protected boolean isHeldExclusively() {
* return getState() == 1;
* }
*
* // Acquires the lock if state is zero
* public boolean tryAcquire(int acquires) {
* assert acquires == 1; // Otherwise unused
* if (compareAndSetState(0, 1)) {
* setExclusiveOwnerThread(Thread.currentThread());
* return true;
* }
* return false;
* }
*
* // Releases the lock by setting state to zero
* protected boolean tryRelease(int releases) {
* assert releases == 1; // Otherwise unused
* if (getState() == 0) throw new IllegalMonitorStateException();
* setExclusiveOwnerThread(null);
* setState(0);
* return true;
* }
*
* // Provides a Condition
* Condition newCondition() { return new ConditionObject(); }
*
* // Deserializes properly
* private void readObject(ObjectInputStream s)
* throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
* s.defaultReadObject();
* setState(0); // reset to unlocked state
* }
* }
*
* // The sync object does all the hard work. We just forward to it.
* private final Sync sync = new Sync();
*
* public void lock() { sync.acquire(1); }
* public boolean tryLock() { return sync.tryAcquire(1); }
* public void unlock() { sync.release(1); }
* public Condition newCondition() { return sync.newCondition(); }
* public boolean isLocked() { return sync.isHeldExclusively(); }
* public boolean hasQueuedThreads() { return sync.hasQueuedThreads(); }
* public void lockInterruptibly() throws InterruptedException {
* sync.acquireInterruptibly(1);
* }
* public boolean tryLock(long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
* throws InterruptedException {
* return sync.tryAcquireNanos(1, unit.toNanos(timeout));
* }
* }}</pre>
*
* <p>Here is a latch class that is like a
* {@link java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch CountDownLatch}
* except that it only requires a single {@code signal} to
* fire. Because a latch is non-exclusive, it uses the {@code shared}
* acquire and release methods.
*
* <pre> {@code
* class BooleanLatch {
*
* private static class Sync extends AbstractQueuedSynchronizer {
* boolean isSignalled() { return getState() != 0; }
*
* protected int tryAcquireShared(int ignore) {
* return isSignalled() ? 1 : -1;
* }
*
* protected boolean tryReleaseShared(int ignore) {
* setState(1);
* return true;
* }
* }
*
* private final Sync sync = new Sync();
* public boolean isSignalled() { return sync.isSignalled(); }
* public void signal() { sync.releaseShared(1); }
* public void await() throws InterruptedException {
* sync.acquireSharedInterruptibly(1);
* }
* }}</pre>
*
* @since 1.5
* @author Doug Lea
*/
public abstract class AbstractQueuedSynchronizer
extends AbstractOwnableSynchronizer
implements java.io.Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 7373984972572414691L;
/**
* Creates a new {@code AbstractQueuedSynchronizer} instance
* with initial synchronization state of zero.
*/
protected AbstractQueuedSynchronizer() { }
/**
* Wait queue node class.
*
* <p>The wait queue is a variant of a "CLH" (Craig, Landin, and
* Hagersten) lock queue. CLH locks are normally used for
* spinlocks. We instead use them for blocking synchronizers, but
* use the same basic tactic of holding some of the control
* information about a thread in the predecessor of its node. A
* "status" field in each node keeps track of whether a thread
* should block. A node is signalled when its predecessor
* releases. Each node of the queue otherwise serves as a
* specific-notification-style monitor holding a single waiting
* thread. The status field does NOT control whether threads are
* granted locks etc though. A thread may try to acquire if it is
* first in the queue. But being first does not guarantee success;
* it only gives the right to contend. So the currently released
* contender thread may need to rewait.
* 等待隊列是一個CLH鎖隊列的變體。CLH鎖通常使用自旋鎖。我們使用阻塞的同步器代替它，
* 但是使用相同相同的基礎策略，在當前節點保存上一個線程的信息。一個 status字段在每個節點
* 保存線程是否阻塞的蹤跡。一個節點是一個信號當它的前一個節點釋放。否則隊列的每個節點
* 充當一個保存單個等待線程的特定通知樣式監視器。status字段不能控制線程是否獲取鎖的。
* 一個線程可能嘗試獲取資源如果它是隊列的第一個元素。但是作爲第一個不能保證成功，它只是
* 給予競爭的權利。因此當前釋放的競爭線程可能需要再次等待。
* <p>To enqueue into a CLH lock, you atomically splice it in as new
* tail. To dequeue, you just set the head field.
* 在CLH鎖進行入隊操作需要原子的將tail指針變爲新的tail指針，出隊操作，你只需要設置
* 首指針
* <pre>
* +------+ prev +-----+ +-----+
* head | | <---- | | <---- | | tail
* +------+ +-----+ +-----+
* </pre>
*
* <p>Insertion into a CLH queue requires only a single atomic
* operation on "tail", so there is a simple atomic point of
* demarcation from unqueued to queued. Similarly, dequeuing
* involves only updating the "head". However, it takes a bit
* more work for nodes to determine who their successors are,
* in part to deal with possible cancellation due to timeouts
* and interrupts.
* 插入到一個CLH隊列要求只有一個單原子操作在tail上，因此這個沒有排隊
* 和排隊的分界 的一個簡單的原子點。類似的，出隊只包含更新head.然而
* 它需要一些工作來決定哪個節點來繼承他，部分原因是處理因爲超時取消或者
* 中斷
*
*
* <p>The "prev" links (not used in original CLH locks), are mainly
* needed to handle cancellation. If a node is cancelled, its
* successor is (normally) relinked to a non-cancelled
* predecessor. For explanation of similar mechanics in the case
* of spin locks, see the papers by Scott and Scherer at
* http://www.cs.rochester.edu/u/scott/synchronization/
* perv指針（原來的CLH鎖沒有這字段）是主要需要去處理取消操作。如果一個節點
* 取消，它的繼任者會重新指向一個沒有被取消的前節點。
*
* <p>We also use "next" links to implement blocking mechanics.
* The thread id for each node is kept in its own node, so a
* predecessor signals the next node to wake up by traversing
* next link to determine which thread it is. Determination of
* successor must avoid races with newly queued nodes to set
* the "next" fields of their predecessors. This is solved
* when necessary by checking backwards from the atomically
* updated "tail" when a node's successor appears to be null.
* (Or, said differently, the next-links are an optimization
* so that we don't usually need a backward scan.)
* 我們繼續使用next指針去實現阻塞機制。每個節點的線程id保存在自己的
* 節點中，因此一個先前的節點的通過next指針去決定喚醒哪個下個節點
* 繼承者必須避免和新的隊列節點在設置他們前一個節點的next字段時發生競爭。
* 當節點的後繼節點是null的時候通過原子的更新tail向後檢查來解決這個問題。
* 或者從不同的角度說，next指針還是一種優化，因此我們不通常不需要回溯
*
* <p>Cancellation introduces some conservatism to the basic
* algorithms. Since we must poll for cancellation of other
* nodes, we can miss noticing whether a cancelled node is
* ahead or behind us. This is dealt with by always unparking
* successors upon cancellation, allowing them to stabilize on
* a new predecessor, unless we can identify an uncancelled
* predecessor who will carry this responsibility.
* 我們可能會忽略在前面或後面節點的取消通知。這個總是在取消前喚醒後繼者
* 允許他們去鏈接一個新的前節點，除非我們能明確一個沒有取消的先的節點
* 它將會承擔這個責任（它會成爲這個後繼者的新的前節點）
* <p>CLH queues need a dummy header node to get started. But
* we don't create them on construction, because it would be wasted
* effort if there is never contention. Instead, the node
* is constructed and head and tail pointers are set upon first
* contention.
* CLH需要一個假的頭結點，但是我們不在構造中創建他們，因爲它可能永遠不被使用
* 這樣就被浪費了。結點被構建還有頭指針和尾指針是在第一個結點創建開始。
*
* <p>Threads waiting on Conditions use the same nodes, but
* use an additional link. Conditions only need to link nodes
* in simple (non-concurrent) linked queues because they are
* only accessed when exclusively held. Upon await, a node is
* inserted into a condition queue. Upon signal, the node is
* transferred to the main queue. A special value of status
* field is used to mark which queue a node is on.
* 線程等待條件使用同一個結點，但是使用的是一個附加鏈接。條件值需要去
* 鏈接結點在一個簡單（非併發）鏈接隊列，他們僅在獨佔持有時訪問。在等待上，
* 結點是轉移到主隊列，一個狀態的特殊值被用來去標記隊列的一個節點。
*
* <p>Thanks go to Dave Dice, Mark Moir, Victor Luchangco, Bill
* Scherer and Michael Scott, along with members of JSR-166
* expert group, for helpful ideas, discussions, and critiques
* on the design of this class.
*/
static final class Node {
/** Marker to indicate a node is waiting in shared mode */
/**標記來標識節點是以共享模式等待*/
static final Node SHARED = new Node();
/** Marker to indicate a node is waiting in exclusive mode */
/**標記節點以獨佔模式等待*/
static final Node EXCLUSIVE = null;
/** waitStatus value to indicate thread has cancelled */
/**線程取消狀態*/
static final int CANCELLED = 1;
/** waitStatus value to indicate successor's thread needs unparking */
/**等待狀態標識繼任線程需要啓動*/
static final int SIGNAL = -1;
/** waitStatus value to indicate thread is waiting on condition */
/**等待狀態標識線程在等待狀態*/
static final int CONDITION = -2;
/**
* waitStatus value to indicate the next acquireShared should
* unconditionally propagate
*/
/**等待狀態去標識下一個獲取共享需要無條件的傳播*/
static final int PROPAGATE = -3;
/**
* Status field, taking on only the values:
* SIGNAL: The successor of this node is (or will soon be)
* blocked (via park), so the current node must
* unpark its successor when it releases or
* cancels. To avoid races, acquire methods must
* first indicate they need a signal,
* then retry the atomic acquire, and then,
* on failure, block.
* 這個節點的接替者是阻塞。因此這個當前節點必須在它釋放資源或取消
* 的時候地洞它的接替者。爲了避免競爭，請求資源方法必須首先表示他們
* 需要一個signal，然後重試原子獲取，然後失敗，阻塞。
* CANCELLED: This node is cancelled due to timeout or interrupt.
* Nodes never leave this state. In particular,
* a thread with cancelled node never again blocks.
* 這個節點由於超時或中斷被取消，節點永遠不會離開這個狀態。
* 特別，具有已取消節點的線程永遠不會阻塞。
*
* CONDITION: This node is currently on a condition queue.
* It will not be used as a sync queue node
* until transferred, at which time the status
* will be set to 0. (Use of this value here has
* nothing to do with the other uses of the
* field, but simplifies mechanics.)
* 這個節點當前在一個條件隊列。它不會被作爲一個同步隊列節點
* 直到轉移。當時的節點狀態將被設置爲0.（此處使用此值與字段的
* 其他用途無關）
*
* PROPAGATE: A releaseShared should be propagated to other
* nodes. This is set (for head node only) in
* doReleaseShared to ensure propagation
* continues, even if other operations have
* since intervened.
* 一個釋放共享應該被傳播到其他節點。這個設置在釋放共享的
* 過程中去確保傳播。
* 0: None of the above
*
* The values are arranged numerically to simplify use.
* Non-negative values mean that a node doesn't need to
* signal. So, most code doesn't need to check for particular
* values, just for sign.
* 使用安排的數字去簡化使用。非負的值表示節點不需要發出信號。
* 因此大多數code不需要去檢查特別的值，只是一個標記。
*
* The field is initialized to 0 for normal sync nodes, and
* CONDITION for condition nodes. It is modified using CAS
* (or when possible, unconditional volatile writes).
*
* 這個字段同常同步節點初始值爲0，CONDITION爲條件節點。它使用CAS修改。
*/
volatile int waitStatus;
/**
* Link to predecessor node that current node/thread relies on
* for checking waitStatus. Assigned during enqueuing, and nulled
* out (for sake of GC) only upon dequeuing. Also, upon
* cancellation of a predecessor, we short-circuit while
* finding a non-cancelled one, which will always exist
* because the head node is never cancelled: A node becomes
* head only as a result of successful acquire. A
* cancelled thread never succeeds in acquiring, and a thread only
* cancels itself, not any other node.
* 去鏈接前一個節點，當前節點/線程依靠檢查waitStatus。在入隊的過程中賦值。
* 只有在出隊中才設定爲null值。在前一個節點被取消的情況下，我們將這個值
* 指向一個沒有取消的節點--這個節點肯定存在，因爲投節點永遠不會被取消。
* 一個節點成爲頭結點只作爲一個成功請求資源的結果。一個取消線程永遠不會請求資源成功
* 一個線程只有取消它自己，不能取消別的節點。
*
*/
volatile Node prev;
/**
* Link to the successor node that the current node/thread
* unparks upon release. Assigned during enqueuing, adjusted
* when bypassing cancelled predecessors, and nulled out (for
* sake of GC) when dequeued. The enq operation does not
* assign next field of a predecessor until after attachment,
* so seeing a null next field does not necessarily mean that
* node is at end of queue. However, if a next field appears
* to be null, we can scan prev's from the tail to
* double-check. The next field of cancelled nodes is set to
* point to the node itself instead of null, to make life
* easier for isOnSyncQueue.
* 鏈接繼任者，當前節點線程啓動釋放。設定值在入隊的，在繞過取消的先前節點，和
* 出隊的時候調整值。入隊操作不指定這個節點的next字段知道有下一個節點入隊。
* 因此發現一個空的下一個字段不能完全以爲這個節點是隊尾。然而，如果下一個字段
* 表現爲null,我們可以從隊尾掃描前一個去雙層檢測。取消節點的next變量
* 去設定爲本身而不是null
*
*
*/
volatile Node next;
/**
* The thread that enqueued this node. Initialized on
* construction and nulled out after use.
* 當前節點入隊的線程，在構造時初始化，在使用完後置爲null
*/
volatile Thread thread;
/**
* Link to next node waiting on condition, or the special
* value SHARED. Because condition queues are accessed only
* when holding in exclusive mode, we just need a simple
* linked queue to hold nodes while they are waiting on
* conditions. They are then transferred to the queue to
* re-acquire. And because conditions can only be exclusive,
* we save a field by using special value to indicate shared
* mode.
*
* 指向下一個在等待狀態的節點或特殊值SHARED，因爲條件隊列被存儲只有在
* 獨佔模式，我只需要一個簡單的鏈表隊列去鏈接節點在他們在等待條件期間
* 他們然後被轉移到隊列去再次獲取資源。因爲條件能只被獨佔，我們保存一個
* 字段通過使用特殊的值去表明共享模式。
*/
Node nextWaiter;
/**
* Returns true if node is waiting in shared mode.
* 如果節點在共享模式下等待返回true
*/
final boolean isShared() {
return nextWaiter == SHARED;
}
/**
* Returns previous node, or throws NullPointerException if null.
* Use when predecessor cannot be null. The null check could
* be elided, but is present to help the VM.
*
* @return the predecessor of this node
*/
final Node predecessor() throws NullPointerException {
Node p = prev;
if (p == null)
throw new NullPointerException();
else
return p;
}
Node() { // Used to establish initial head or SHARED marker
}
Node(Thread thread, Node mode) { // Used by addWaiter
this.nextWaiter = mode;
this.thread = thread;
}
Node(Thread thread, int waitStatus) { // Used by Condition
this.waitStatus = waitStatus;
this.thread = thread;
}
}
/**
* Head of the wait queue, lazily initialized. Except for
* initialization, it is modified only via method setHead. Note:
* If head exists, its waitStatus is guaranteed not to be
* CANCELLED.
*
* 等待隊列的頭，延遲初始化。除了初始化，它能被修改只通過setHead方法。
* 如果頭存在，它的等待狀態保證不會是取消。
*/
private transient volatile Node head;
/**
* Tail of the wait queue, lazily initialized. Modified only via
* method enq to add new wait node.
* 等待隊列的尾部，延遲初始化。只在通過enq方法來增加新的等待節點的時候。
*/
private transient volatile Node tail;
/**
* The synchronization state.
* 同步狀態
*/
private volatile int state;
/**
* Returns the current value of synchronization state.
* This operation has memory semantics of a {@code volatile} read.
* @return current state value
*/
protected final int getState() {
return state;
}
/**
* Sets the value of synchronization state.
* This operation has memory semantics of a {@code volatile} write.
* @param newState the new state value
*/
protected final void setState(int newState) {
state = newState;
}
/**
* Atomically sets synchronization state to the given updated
* value if the current state value equals the expected value.
* This operation has memory semantics of a {@code volatile} read
* and write.
*
* @param expect the expected value
* @param update the new value
* @return {@code true} if successful. False return indicates that the actual
* value was not equal to the expected value.
*/
protected final boolean compareAndSetState(int expect, int update) {
// See below for intrinsics setup to support this
return unsafe.compareAndSwapInt(this, stateOffset, expect, update);
}
// Queuing utilities
/**
* The number of nanoseconds for which it is faster to spin
* rather than to use timed park. A rough estimate suffices
* to improve responsiveness with very short timeouts.
* 自旋使用納秒數比使用時間停止更快。粗略的估計滿足提高響應在較短的
* 超時時間。
*
*/
static final long spinForTimeoutThreshold = 1000L;
/**
* Inserts node into queue, initializing if necessary. See picture above.
* @param node the node to insert
* @return node's predecessor
*/
private Node enq(final Node node) {
for (;;) {
Node t = tail;
if (t == null) { // Must initialize
if (compareAndSetHead(new Node()))
tail = head;
} else {
node.prev = t;
//將尾指針替換爲了node,t還是指向的先前的尾指針
if (compareAndSetTail(t, node)) {
//將先前的尾指針指向現在新的尾指針
t.next = node;
return t;
}
}
}
}
/**
* Creates and enqueues node for current thread and given mode.
*
* @param mode Node.EXCLUSIVE for exclusive, Node.SHARED for shared
* @return the new node
*/
private Node addWaiter(Node mode) {
Node node = new Node(Thread.currentThread(), mode);
// Try the fast path of enq; backup to full enq on failure
//嘗試快速入隊，如果tail沒有初始化則使用enq()入隊。enq（）中是一個循環，知道入隊成功
Node pred = tail;
if (pred != null) {
node.prev = pred;
if (compareAndSetTail(pred, node)) {
pred.next = node;
return node;
}
}
enq(node);
return node;
}
/**
* Sets head of queue to be node, thus dequeuing. Called only by
* acquire methods. Also nulls out unused fields for sake of GC
* and to suppress unnecessary signals and traversals.
*
* @param node the node
*/
private void setHead(Node node) {
head = node;
node.thread = null;
node.prev = null;
}
/**
* Wakes up node's successor, if one exists.
* 喚醒下一個節點，如果它存在。
* @param node the node
*/
private void unparkSuccessor(Node node) {
/*
* If status is negative (i.e., possibly needing signal) try
* to clear in anticipation of signalling. It is OK if this
* fails or if status is changed by waiting thread.
*/
//如果狀態是負數（可能需要信號），
int ws = node.waitStatus;
if (ws < 0)
compareAndSetWaitStatus(node, ws, 0);
/*
* Thread to unpark is held in successor, which is normally
* just the next node. But if cancelled or apparently null,
* traverse backwards from tail to find the actual
* non-cancelled successor.
*/
Node s = node.next;
//如果下一個節點是null或者是大於0的狀態（大於0說明節點已經被取消）
//所以需要從隊尾開始遍歷，找到離當前節點最近且沒有取消的阻塞節點。
//然後去喚醒它。
if (s == null || s.waitStatus > 0) {
s = null;
for (Node t = tail; t != null && t != node; t = t.prev)
if (t.waitStatus <= 0)
s = t;
}
if (s != null)
LockSupport.unpark(s.thread);
}
/**
* Release action for shared mode -- signals successor and ensures
* propagation. (Note: For exclusive mode, release just amounts
* to calling unparkSuccessor of head if it needs signal.)
* 共享模式的釋放動作--向後繼者發送信號，並且確保被傳播。
* 獨佔模式，釋放資源只需要去喚醒頭的下一個節點如果它需要的話。
*
*
*/
private void doReleaseShared() {
/*
* Ensure that a release propagates, even if there are other
* in-progress acquires/releases. This proceeds in the usual
* way of trying to unparkSuccessor of head if it needs
* signal. But if it does not, status is set to PROPAGATE to
* ensure that upon release, propagation continues.
* Additionally, we must loop in case a new node is added
* while we are doing this. Also, unlike other uses of
* unparkSuccessor, we need to know if CAS to reset status
* fails, if so rechecking.
*/
for (;;) {
Node h = head;
if (h != null && h != tail) {
int ws = h.waitStatus;
//如果當前節點狀態是SIGNAL，將當前節點的狀態置爲0，然後喚醒下一個節點
if (ws == Node.SIGNAL) {
if (!compareAndSetWaitStatus(h, Node.SIGNAL, 0))
continue; // loop to recheck cases
unparkSuccessor(h);
}
//如果當前的狀態是0，就將當前的狀態設置爲PROPAGATE，將釋放傳播出去。
else if (ws == 0 &&
!compareAndSetWaitStatus(h, 0, Node.PROPAGATE))
continue; // loop on failed CAS
}
if (h == head) // loop if head changed
break;
}
}
/**
* Sets head of queue, and checks if successor may be waiting
* in shared mode, if so propagating if either propagate > 0 or
* PROPAGATE status was set.
* 設置隊列頭指針，檢測如果有下一個節點可能在共享模式等待。如果是傳播
* 要麼propagate大於0,要麼設置爲PROPAGATE狀態。
*
* @param node the node
* @param propagate the return value from a tryAcquireShared
*/
private void setHeadAndPropagate(Node node, int propagate) {
Node h = head; // Record old head for check below
setHead(node);
/*
* Try to signal next queued node if:
* Propagation was indicated by caller,
* or was recorded (as h.waitStatus either before
* or after setHead) by a previous operation
* (note: this uses sign-check of waitStatus because
* PROPAGATE status may transition to SIGNAL.)
* and
* The next node is waiting in shared mode,
* or we don't know, because it appears null
*
* The conservatism in both of these checks may cause
* unnecessary wake-ups, but only when there are multiple
* racing acquires/releases, so most need signals now or soon
* anyway.
*/
if (propagate > 0 || h == null || h.waitStatus < 0 ||
(h = head) == null || h.waitStatus < 0) {
Node s = node.next;
if (s == null || s.isShared())
doReleaseShared();
}
}
// Utilities for various versions of acquire
/**
* Cancels an ongoing attempt to acquire.
* 取消正在嘗試請求資源的節點。
* @param node the node
*/
private void cancelAcquire(Node node) {
// Ignore if node doesn't exist
if (node == null)
return;
node.thread = null;
// Skip cancelled predecessors
Node pred = node.prev;
while (pred.waitStatus > 0)
node.prev = pred = pred.prev;
// predNext is the apparent node to unsplice. CASes below will
// fail if not, in which case, we lost race vs another cancel
// or signal, so no further action is necessary.
//這裏獲取的predNext沒有特別的作用，只是在進行CAS操作的時候確定pred的下一個節點沒有被修改。
//如果被修改了那這次的操作就不會成功了。
Node predNext = pred.next;
// Can use unconditional write instead of CAS here.
// After this atomic step, other Nodes can skip past us.
// Before, we are free of interference from other threads.
node.waitStatus = Node.CANCELLED;
// If we are the tail, remove ourselves.
if (node == tail && compareAndSetTail(node, pred)) {
compareAndSetNext(pred, predNext, null);
} else {
// If successor needs signal, try to set pred's next-link
// so it will get one. Otherwise wake it up to propagate.
int ws;
//如果要取消節點的前一個節點不是頭結點，且（前一個節點的狀態爲SIGNAL，
// 或（前一個節點的狀態爲CONDITION且將它的狀態置爲SIGNAL）且前一個節點的
//線程不爲null.
//
//
if (pred != head &&
((ws = pred.waitStatus) == Node.SIGNAL ||
(ws <= 0 && compareAndSetWaitStatus(pred, ws, Node.SIGNAL))) &&
pred.thread != null) {
Node next = node.next;
//如果要取消節點的下一個節點不爲空且狀態不爲取消狀態，則將取消節點的下一個節點
//設置爲取消節點的上一個節點的next
if (next != null && next.waitStatus <= 0)
compareAndSetNext(pred, predNext, next);
} else {
//
unparkSuccessor(node);
}
//將取消節點的下一個節點指向自己
node.next = node; // help GC
}
}
/**
* Checks and updates status for a node that failed to acquire.
* Returns true if thread should block. This is the main signal
* control in all acquire loops. Requires that pred == node.prev.
* 爲請求資源失敗的節點檢測和更新狀態。返回true,如果節點需要阻塞。這個是
* 主要的信號控制在所有請求資源循環
* @param pred node's predecessor holding status
* @param node the node
* @return {@code true} if thread should block
*/
private static boolean shouldParkAfterFailedAcquire(Node pred, Node node) {
int ws = pred.waitStatus;
if (ws == Node.SIGNAL)
/*
* This node has already set status asking a release
* to signal it, so it can safely park.
*/
return true;
if (ws > 0) {
/*
* Predecessor was cancelled. Skip over predecessors and
* indicate retry.
*/
do {
node.prev = pred = pred.prev;
} while (pred.waitStatus > 0);
pred.next = node;
} else {
/*
* waitStatus must be 0 or PROPAGATE. Indicate that we
* need a signal, but don't park yet. Caller will need to
* retry to make sure it cannot acquire before parking.
*/
compareAndSetWaitStatus(pred, ws, Node.SIGNAL);
}
return false;
}
/**
* Convenience method to interrupt current thread.
*/
static void selfInterrupt() {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
}
/**
* Convenience method to park and then check if interrupted
*
* @return {@code true} if interrupted
*/
private final boolean parkAndCheckInterrupt() {
//阻塞當前線程
LockSupport.park(this);
//測試當前線程有沒有中斷，並重置中斷狀態
return Thread.interrupted();
}
/*
* Various flavors of acquire, varying in exclusive/shared and
* control modes. Each is mostly the same, but annoyingly
* different. Only a little bit of factoring is possible due to
* interactions of exception mechanics (including ensuring that we
* cancel if tryAcquire throws exception) and other control, at
* least not without hurting performance too much.
*/
/***
* 各種各樣的請求資源，獨佔共享和控制模式的差異。每個基本都是一樣的，但是
* 但是也有不同的。只有一個點
*
*/
/**
* Acquires in exclusive uninterruptible mode for thread already in
* queue. Used by condition wait methods as well as acquire.
* 在獨佔不可中斷模式請求資源爲線程
* 用於條件等待方法，以及獲取。
*
* @param node the node
* @param arg the acquire argument
* @return {@code true} if interrupted while waiting
*/
final boolean acquireQueued(final Node node, int arg) {
boolean failed = true;
try {
boolean interrupted = false;
for (;;) {
final Node p = node.predecessor();
//如果當前節點的前一個節點是頭結點，請求資源
if (p == head && tryAcquire(arg)) {
//將當前節點設置爲頭結點。
setHead(node);
//舊的頭結點的下個節點字段置爲null
p.next = null; // help GC
failed = false;
return interrupted;
}
//shouldParkAfterFailedAcquire方法中會校驗前節點有沒有被取消
//shouldParkAfterFailedAcquire如果返回true，
// 將執行parkAndCheckInterrupt（）將
//當前線程進行阻塞，然後等待前面的節點喚醒後面的節點
//在parkAndCheckInterrupt（）中如果線程是中斷的，那會返回true，
//interrupted字段會設置爲ture，說明線程有中斷過。
if (shouldParkAfterFailedAcquire(p, node) &&
parkAndCheckInterrupt())
interrupted = true;
}
} finally {
if (failed)
//刪除了當前的節點
cancelAcquire(node);
}
}
/**
* 請求資源在獨佔可中斷模式
* Acquires in exclusive interruptible mode.
* @param arg the acquire argument
*/
private void doAcquireInterruptibly(int arg)
throws InterruptedException {
final Node node = addWaiter(Node.EXCLUSIVE);
boolean failed = true;
try {
for (;;) {
final Node p = node.predecessor();
if (p == head && tryAcquire(arg)) {
setHead(node);
p.next = null; // help GC
failed = false;
return;
}
if (shouldParkAfterFailedAcquire(p, node) &&
parkAndCheckInterrupt())
throw new InterruptedException();
}
} finally {
if (failed)
cancelAcquire(node);
}
}
/**
* Acquires in exclusive timed mode.
* 請求資源在獨佔定時模式
* 如果在設定的時間內沒有請去到資源則返回
*
* @param arg the acquire argument
* @param nanosTimeout max wait time
* @return {@code true} if acquired
*/
private boolean doAcquireNanos(int arg, long nanosTimeout)
throws InterruptedException {
if (nanosTimeout <= 0L)
return false;
final long deadline = System.nanoTime() + nanosTimeout;
final Node node = addWaiter(Node.EXCLUSIVE);
boolean failed = true;
try {
for (;;) {
final Node p = node.predecessor();
if (p == head && tryAcquire(arg)) {
setHead(node);
p.next = null; // help GC
failed = false;
return true;
}
nanosTimeout = deadline - System.nanoTime();
if (nanosTimeout <= 0L)
return false;
if (shouldParkAfterFailedAcquire(p, node) &&
nanosTimeout > spinForTimeoutThreshold)
//如果超過了設定的自旋時間則阻塞nanosTimeout
LockSupport.parkNanos(this, nanosTimeout);
if (Thread.interrupted())
throw new InterruptedException();
}
} finally {
if (failed)
cancelAcquire(node);
}
}
/**
* Acquires in shared uninterruptible mode.
*
* 在共享不可中斷模式下請求資源。
* @param arg the acquire argument
*/
private void doAcquireShared(int arg) {
final Node node = addWaiter(Node.SHARED);
boolean failed = true;
try {
boolean interrupted = false;
for (;;) {
final Node p = node.predecessor();
if (p == head) {
int r = tryAcquireShared(arg);
if (r >= 0) {
setHeadAndPropagate(node, r);
p.next = null; // help GC
if (interrupted)
selfInterrupt();
failed = false;
return;
}
}
if (shouldParkAfterFailedAcquire(p, node) &&
parkAndCheckInterrupt())
interrupted = true;
}
} finally {
if (failed)
cancelAcquire(node);
}
}
/**
* Acquires in shared interruptible mode.
* @param arg the acquire argument
*/
private void doAcquireSharedInterruptibly(int arg)
throws InterruptedException {
final Node node = addWaiter(Node.SHARED);
boolean failed = true;
try {
for (;;) {
final Node p = node.predecessor();
if (p == head) {
int r = tryAcquireShared(arg);
if (r >= 0) {
setHeadAndPropagate(node, r);
p.next = null; // help GC
failed = false;
return;
}
}
if (shouldParkAfterFailedAcquire(p, node) &&
parkAndCheckInterrupt())
throw new InterruptedException();
}
} finally {
if (failed)
cancelAcquire(node);
}
}
/**
* Acquires in shared timed mode.
*
* @param arg the acquire argument
* @param nanosTimeout max wait time
* @return {@code true} if acquired
*/
private boolean doAcquireSharedNanos(int arg, long nanosTimeout)
throws InterruptedException {
if (nanosTimeout <= 0L)
return false;
final long deadline = System.nanoTime() + nanosTimeout;
final Node node = addWaiter(Node.SHARED);
boolean failed = true;
try {
for (;;) {
final Node p = node.predecessor();
if (p == head) {
int r = tryAcquireShared(arg);
if (r >= 0) {
setHeadAndPropagate(node, r);
p.next = null; // help GC
failed = false;
return true;
}
}
nanosTimeout = deadline - System.nanoTime();
if (nanosTimeout <= 0L)
return false;
if (shouldParkAfterFailedAcquire(p, node) &&
nanosTimeout > spinForTimeoutThreshold)
LockSupport.parkNanos(this, nanosTimeout);
if (Thread.interrupted())
throw new InterruptedException();
}
} finally {
if (failed)
cancelAcquire(node);
}
}
// Main exported methods
/**
* Attempts to acquire in exclusive mode. This method should query
* if the state of the object permits it to be acquired in the
* exclusive mode, and if so to acquire it.
* 在獨佔模式嘗試去請求資源。這個方法應該查詢如果對象的狀態允許它請求資源
* 在獨佔模式下，如果是這樣那就獲取它。
* <p>This method is always invoked by the thread performing
* acquire. If this method reports failure, the acquire method
* may queue the thread, if it is not already queued, until it is
* signalled by a release from some other thread. This can be used
* to implement method {@link Lock#tryLock()}.
* 這個方法通常被調用通過線程執行請求資源。如果這個方法返回失敗，請求資源
* 方法可能將線程入隊。如果它沒有已經入隊，直到它是通過其他線程釋放信號。
*
*
*
*
* <p>The default
* implementation throws {@link UnsupportedOperationException}.
*
* @param arg the acquire argument. This value is always the one
* passed to an acquire method, or is the value saved on entry
* to a condition wait. The value is otherwise uninterpreted
* and can represent anything you like.
* @return {@code true} if successful. Upon success, this object has
* been acquired.
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if acquiring would place this
* synchronizer in an illegal state. This exception must be
* thrown in a consistent fashion for synchronization to work
* correctly.
* @throws UnsupportedOperationException if exclusive mode is not supported
*/
protected boolean tryAcquire(int arg) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
/**
* Attempts to set the state to reflect a release in exclusive
* mode.
*
* <p>This method is always invoked by the thread performing release.
*
* <p>The default implementation throws
* {@link UnsupportedOperationException}.
*
* @param arg the release argument. This value is always the one
* passed to a release method, or the current state value upon
* entry to a condition wait. The value is otherwise
* uninterpreted and can represent anything you like.
* @return {@code true} if this object is now in a fully released
* state, so that any waiting threads may attempt to acquire;
* and {@code false} otherwise.
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if releasing would place this
* synchronizer in an illegal state. This exception must be
* thrown in a consistent fashion for synchronization to work
* correctly.
* @throws UnsupportedOperationException if exclusive mode is not supported
*/
protected boolean tryRelease(int arg) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
/**
* Attempts to acquire in shared mode. This method should query if
* the state of the object permits it to be acquired in the shared
* mode, and if so to acquire it.
*
* <p>This method is always invoked by the thread performing
* acquire. If this method reports failure, the acquire method
* may queue the thread, if it is not already queued, until it is
* signalled by a release from some other thread.
*
* <p>The default implementation throws {@link
* UnsupportedOperationException}.
*
* @param arg the acquire argument. This value is always the one
* passed to an acquire method, or is the value saved on entry
* to a condition wait. The value is otherwise uninterpreted
* and can represent anything you like.
* @return a negative value on failure; zero if acquisition in shared
* mode succeeded but no subsequent shared-mode acquire can
* succeed; and a positive value if acquisition in shared
* mode succeeded and subsequent shared-mode acquires might
* also succeed, in which case a subsequent waiting thread
* must check availability. (Support for three different
* return values enables this method to be used in contexts
* where acquires only sometimes act exclusively.) Upon
* success, this object has been acquired.
* 負數表示失敗，0如果在共享模式下請求資源成功，但是後面共享模式請求資源
* 都會失敗。一個正數，如果在請求資源在共享模式下它的後面的請求也有可能
* 是成功的。在這種情況下後續的等待線程必須檢查可用性。
*
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if acquiring would place this
* synchronizer in an illegal state. This exception must be
* thrown in a consistent fashion for synchronization to work
* correctly.
* @throws UnsupportedOperationException if shared mode is not supported
*/
protected int tryAcquireShared(int arg) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
/**
* Attempts to set the state to reflect a release in shared mode.
*
* <p>This method is always invoked by the thread performing release.
*
* <p>The default implementation throws
* {@link UnsupportedOperationException}.
*
* @param arg the release argument. This value is always the one
* passed to a release method, or the current state value upon
* entry to a condition wait. The value is otherwise
* uninterpreted and can represent anything you like.
* @return {@code true} if this release of shared mode may permit a
* waiting acquire (shared or exclusive) to succeed; and
* {@code false} otherwise
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if releasing would place this
* synchronizer in an illegal state. This exception must be
* thrown in a consistent fashion for synchronization to work
* correctly.
* @throws UnsupportedOperationException if shared mode is not supported
*/
protected boolean tryReleaseShared(int arg) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
/**
* Returns {@code true} if synchronization is held exclusively with
* respect to the current (calling) thread. This method is invoked
* upon each call to a non-waiting {@link ConditionObject} method.
* (Waiting methods instead invoke {@link #release}.)
*
* 返回true如果當前線程同步器是獨佔。這個方法被調用不是等待狀態的方法。
*
*
*
* <p>The default implementation throws {@link
* UnsupportedOperationException}. This method is invoked
* internally only within {@link ConditionObject} methods, so need
* not be defined if conditions are not used.
* 這個方法時被調用在conditionObject內部方法，因此不需要被定義如果狀態沒有被使用。
*
* @return {@code true} if synchronization is held exclusively;
* {@code false} otherwise
* @throws UnsupportedOperationException if conditions are not supported
*/
protected boolean isHeldExclusively() {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
/**
* Acquires in exclusive mode, ignoring interrupts. Implemented
* by invoking at least once {@link #tryAcquire},
* returning on success. Otherwise the thread is queued, possibly
* repeatedly blocking and unblocking, invoking {@link
* #tryAcquire} until success. This method can be used
* to implement method {@link Lock#lock}.
*
* 請求資源在獨佔模式，忽略中斷。通過至少調用一次tryAcquire執行，返回成功。
* 否則線程入隊，可能對此阻塞和不阻塞，直到調用tryAcquire成功。這個方法
* 可以被使用去實現鎖。
* @param arg the acquire argument. This value is conveyed to
* {@link #tryAcquire} but is otherwise uninterpreted and
* can represent anything you like.
*
*/
public final void acquire(int arg) {
//先嚐試請求一次，如果失敗在使用acquireQueued（）循環請求。如果最後都失敗
//就中斷線程。 acquireQueued返回的是否中斷，如果是中斷就執行中斷，如果是請求
//成功就會返回。
if (!tryAcquire(arg) &&
acquireQueued(addWaiter(Node.EXCLUSIVE), arg))
//如果線程中斷過，就再次中斷線程。
selfInterrupt();
}
/**
* Acquires in exclusive mode, aborting if interrupted.
* Implemented by first checking interrupt status, then invoking
* at least once {@link #tryAcquire}, returning on
* success. Otherwise the thread is queued, possibly repeatedly
* blocking and unblocking, invoking {@link #tryAcquire}
* until success or the thread is interrupted. This method can be
* used to implement method {@link Lock#lockInterruptibly}.
*
* @param arg the acquire argument. This value is conveyed to
* {@link #tryAcquire} but is otherwise uninterpreted and
* can represent anything you like.
* @throws InterruptedException if the current thread is interrupted
*/
public final void acquireInterruptibly(int arg)
throws InterruptedException {
if (Thread.interrupted())
throw new InterruptedException();
if (!tryAcquire(arg))
doAcquireInterruptibly(arg);
}
/**
* Attempts to acquire in exclusive mode, aborting if interrupted,
* and failing if the given timeout elapses. Implemented by first
* checking interrupt status, then invoking at least once {@link
* #tryAcquire}, returning on success. Otherwise, the thread is
* queued, possibly repeatedly blocking and unblocking, invoking
* {@link #tryAcquire} until success or the thread is interrupted
* or the timeout elapses. This method can be used to implement
* method {@link Lock#tryLock(long, TimeUnit)}.
*
* @param arg the acquire argument. This value is conveyed to
* {@link #tryAcquire} but is otherwise uninterpreted and
* can represent anything you like.
* @param nanosTimeout the maximum number of nanoseconds to wait
* @return {@code true} if acquired; {@code false} if timed out
* @throws InterruptedException if the current thread is interrupted
*/
public final boolean tryAcquireNanos(int arg, long nanosTimeout)
throws InterruptedException {
if (Thread.interrupted())
throw new InterruptedException();
return tryAcquire(arg) ||
doAcquireNanos(arg, nanosTimeout);
}
/**
* Releases in exclusive mode. Implemented by unblocking one or
* more threads if {@link #tryRelease} returns true.
* This method can be used to implement method {@link Lock#unlock}.
*
* @param arg the release argument. This value is conveyed to
* {@link #tryRelease} but is otherwise uninterpreted and
* can represent anything you like.
* @return the value returned from {@link #tryRelease}
*/
public final boolean release(int arg) {
if (tryRelease(arg)) {
Node h = head;
if (h != null && h.waitStatus != 0)
unparkSuccessor(h);
return true;
}
return false;
}
/**
* Acquires in shared mode, ignoring interrupts. Implemented by
* first invoking at least once {@link #tryAcquireShared},
* returning on success. Otherwise the thread is queued, possibly
* repeatedly blocking and unblocking, invoking {@link
* #tryAcquireShared} until success.
*
* @param arg the acquire argument. This value is conveyed to
* {@link #tryAcquireShared} but is otherwise uninterpreted
* and can represent anything you like.
*/
public final void acquireShared(int arg) {
if (tryAcquireShared(arg) < 0)
doAcquireShared(arg);
}
/**
* Acquires in shared mode, aborting if interrupted. Implemented
* by first checking interrupt status, then invoking at least once
* {@link #tryAcquireShared}, returning on success. Otherwise the
* thread is queued, possibly repeatedly blocking and unblocking,
* invoking {@link #tryAcquireShared} until success or the thread
* is interrupted.
* @param arg the acquire argument.
* This value is conveyed to {@link #tryAcquireShared} but is
* otherwise uninterpreted and can represent anything
* you like.
* @throws InterruptedException if the current thread is interrupted
*/
public final void acquireSharedInterruptibly(int arg)
throws InterruptedException {
if (Thread.interrupted())
throw new InterruptedException();
if (tryAcquireShared(arg) < 0)
doAcquireSharedInterruptibly(arg);
}
/**
* Attempts to acquire in shared mode, aborting if interrupted, and
* failing if the given timeout elapses. Implemented by first
* checking interrupt status, then invoking at least once {@link
* #tryAcquireShared}, returning on success. Otherwise, the
* thread is queued, possibly repeatedly blocking and unblocking,
* invoking {@link #tryAcquireShared} until success or the thread
* is interrupted or the timeout elapses.
*
* @param arg the acquire argument. This value is conveyed to
* {@link #tryAcquireShared} but is otherwise uninterpreted
* and can represent anything you like.
* @param nanosTimeout the maximum number of nanoseconds to wait
* @return {@code true} if acquired; {@code false} if timed out
* @throws InterruptedException if the current thread is interrupted
*/
public final boolean tryAcquireSharedNanos(int arg, long nanosTimeout)
throws InterruptedException {
if (Thread.interrupted())
throw new InterruptedException();
return tryAcquireShared(arg) >= 0 ||
doAcquireSharedNanos(arg, nanosTimeout);
}
/**
* Releases in shared mode. Implemented by unblocking one or more
* threads if {@link #tryReleaseShared} returns true.
* 在共享模式釋放資源。執行通過非阻塞的或更多的線程如果返回true.
* @param arg the release argument. This value is conveyed to
* {@link #tryReleaseShared} but is otherwise uninterpreted
* and can represent anything you like.
* @return the value returned from {@link #tryReleaseShared}
*/
public final boolean releaseShared(int arg) {
if (tryReleaseShared(arg)) {
doReleaseShared();
return true;
}
return false;
}
// Queue inspection methods
/**
* Queries whether any threads are waiting to acquire. Note that
* because cancellations due to interrupts and timeouts may occur
* at any time, a {@code true} return does not guarantee that any
* other thread will ever acquire.
* 查詢是否有線程正在等待獲取資源。因爲中斷和重試可能導致取消，返回true
* 不代表所有的線程都獲取過資源。
* <p>In this implementation, this operation returns in
* constant time.
*
* @return {@code true} if there may be other threads waiting to acquire
*/
public final boolean hasQueuedThreads() {
return head != tail;
}
/**
* Queries whether any threads have ever contended to acquire this
* synchronizer; that is if an acquire method has ever blocked.
*
* <p>In this implementation, this operation returns in
* constant time.
*
* @return {@code true} if there has ever been contention
*/
public final boolean hasContended() {
return head != null;
}
/**
* Returns the first (longest-waiting) thread in the queue, or
* {@code null} if no threads are currently queued.
*
* <p>In this implementation, this operation normally returns in
* constant time, but may iterate upon contention if other threads are
* concurrently modifying the queue.
*
* @return the first (longest-waiting) thread in the queue, or
* {@code null} if no threads are currently queued
*/
public final Thread getFirstQueuedThread() {
// handle only fast path, else relay
return (head == tail) ? null : fullGetFirstQueuedThread();
}
/**
* Version of getFirstQueuedThread called when fastpath fails
*/
private Thread fullGetFirstQueuedThread() {
/*
* The first node is normally head.next. Try to get its
* thread field, ensuring consistent reads: If thread
* field is nulled out or s.prev is no longer head, then
* some other thread(s) concurrently performed setHead in
* between some of our reads. We try this twice before
* resorting to traversal.
*
* 通常頭結點的next指向第一個結點。嘗試去獲取它的線程字段。確保
* 始終讀，如果線程字段null或它的前一個節點不再是以前的head.
* 一些其他線程併發執行setHead方法在我們讀取的過程中。我們
* 在遍歷之前嘗試讀取兩次
*/
Node h, s;
Thread st;
if (((h = head) != null && (s = h.next) != null &&
s.prev == head && (st = s.thread) != null) ||
((h = head) != null && (s = h.next) != null &&
s.prev == head && (st = s.thread) != null))
return st;
/*
* Head's next field might not have been set yet, or may have
* been unset after setHead. So we must check to see if tail
* is actually first node. If not, we continue on, safely
* traversing from tail back to head to find first,
* guaranteeing termination.
*/
Node t = tail;
Thread firstThread = null;
while (t != null && t != head) {
Thread tt = t.thread;
if (tt != null)
firstThread = tt;
t = t.prev;
}
return firstThread;
}
/**
* Returns true if the given thread is currently queued.
* 如果給定的線程當前正在排序則返回true
* <p>This implementation traverses the queue to determine
* presence of the given thread.
* 這個實現是遍歷隊列的所有線程去查詢，。
* @param thread the thread
* @return {@code true} if the given thread is on the queue
* @throws NullPointerException if the thread is null
*/
public final boolean isQueued(Thread thread) {
if (thread == null)
throw new NullPointerException();
for (Node p = tail; p != null; p = p.prev)
if (p.thread == thread)
return true;
return false;
}
/**
* Returns {@code true} if the apparent first queued thread, if one
* exists, is waiting in exclusive mode. If this method returns
* {@code true}, and the current thread is attempting to acquire in
* shared mode (that is, this method is invoked from {@link
* #tryAcquireShared}) then it is guaranteed that the current thread
* is not the first queued thread. Used only as a heuristic in
* ReentrantReadWriteLock.
*
* 如果隊列的第一個線程存在且是在獨佔模式下等待就返回true.如果這個方法返回true,
* 並且當前線程企圖去獲取資源在共享模式下（這是，這個放在在tryAcquireShared裏調用）然後
* 它保證當前線程不是隊列的第一個。使用作爲一個啓發在ReentrantReadWriteLock。
*/
final boolean apparentlyFirstQueuedIsExclusive() {
Node h, s;
return (h = head) != null &&
(s = h.next) != null &&
!s.isShared() &&
s.thread != null;
}
/**
* Queries whether any threads have been waiting to acquire longer
* than the current thread.
*
* <p>An invocation of this method is equivalent to (but may be
* more efficient than):
* <pre> {@code
* getFirstQueuedThread() != Thread.currentThread() &&
* hasQueuedThreads()}</pre>
*
* <p>Note that because cancellations due to interrupts and
* timeouts may occur at any time, a {@code true} return does not
* guarantee that some other thread will acquire before the current
* thread. Likewise, it is possible for another thread to win a
* race to enqueue after this method has returned {@code false},
* due to the queue being empty.
*
* <p>This method is designed to be used by a fair synchronizer to
* avoid <a href="AbstractQueuedSynchronizer#barging">barging</a>.
* Such a synchronizer's {@link #tryAcquire} method should return
* {@code false}, and its {@link #tryAcquireShared} method should
* return a negative value, if this method returns {@code true}
* (unless this is a reentrant acquire). For example, the {@code
* tryAcquire} method for a fair, reentrant, exclusive mode
* synchronizer might look like this:
*
* <pre> {@code
* protected boolean tryAcquire(int arg) {
* if (isHeldExclusively()) {
* // A reentrant acquire; increment hold count
* return true;
* } else if (hasQueuedPredecessors()) {
* return false;
* } else {
* // try to acquire normally
* }
* }}</pre>
*
* @return {@code true} if there is a queued thread preceding the
* current thread, and {@code false} if the current thread
* is at the head of the queue or the queue is empty
* @since 1.7
*/
public final boolean hasQueuedPredecessors() {
// The correctness of this depends on head being initialized
// before tail and on head.next being accurate if the current
// thread is first in queue.
Node t = tail; // Read fields in reverse initialization order
Node h = head;
Node s;
return h != t &&
((s = h.next) == null || s.thread != Thread.currentThread());
}
// Instrumentation and monitoring methods
/**
* Returns an estimate of the number of threads waiting to
* acquire. The value is only an estimate because the number of
* threads may change dynamically while this method traverses
* internal data structures. This method is designed for use in
* monitoring system state, not for synchronization
* control.
* 返回大致的一個等待線程的數量。因爲多線程訪問線程的數量沒有那麼精確。
* @return the estimated number of threads waiting to acquire
*/
public final int getQueueLength() {
int n = 0;
for (Node p = tail; p != null; p = p.prev) {
if (p.thread != null)
++n;
}
return n;
}
/**
* Returns a collection containing threads that may be waiting to
* acquire. Because the actual set of threads may change
* dynamically while constructing this result, the returned
* collection is only a best-effort estimate. The elements of the
* returned collection are in no particular order. This method is
* designed to facilitate construction of subclasses that provide
* more extensive monitoring facilities.
*
* @return the collection of threads
*/
public final Collection<Thread> getQueuedThreads() {
ArrayList<Thread> list = new ArrayList<Thread>();
for (Node p = tail; p != null; p = p.prev) {
Thread t = p.thread;
if (t != null)
list.add(t);
}
return list;
}
/**
* Returns a collection containing threads that may be waiting to
* acquire in exclusive mode. This has the same properties
* as {@link #getQueuedThreads} except that it only returns
* those threads waiting due to an exclusive acquire.
*
* @return the collection of threads
*/
public final Collection<Thread> getExclusiveQueuedThreads() {
ArrayList<Thread> list = new ArrayList<Thread>();
for (Node p = tail; p != null; p = p.prev) {
if (!p.isShared()) {
Thread t = p.thread;
if (t != null)
list.add(t);
}
}
return list;
}
/**
* Returns a collection containing threads that may be waiting to
* acquire in shared mode. This has the same properties
* as {@link #getQueuedThreads} except that it only returns
* those threads waiting due to a shared acquire.
*
* @return the collection of threads
*/
public final Collection<Thread> getSharedQueuedThreads() {
ArrayList<Thread> list = new ArrayList<Thread>();
for (Node p = tail; p != null; p = p.prev) {
if (p.isShared()) {
Thread t = p.thread;
if (t != null)
list.add(t);
}
}
return list;
}
/**
* Returns a string identifying this synchronizer, as well as its state.
* The state, in brackets, includes the String {@code "State ="}
* followed by the current value of {@link #getState}, and either
* {@code "nonempty"} or {@code "empty"} depending on whether the
* queue is empty.
*
* @return a string identifying this synchronizer, as well as its state
*/
public String toString() {
int s = getState();
String q = hasQueuedThreads() ? "non" : "";
return super.toString() +
"[State = " + s + ", " + q + "empty queue]";
}
// Internal support methods for Conditions
/**
* Returns true if a node, always one that was initially placed on
* a condition queue, is now waiting to reacquire on sync queue.
* @param node the node
* @return true if is reacquiring
*/
final boolean isOnSyncQueue(Node node) {
if (node.waitStatus == Node.CONDITION || node.prev == null)
return false;
if (node.next != null) // If has successor, it must be on queue
return true;
/*
* node.prev can be non-null, but not yet on queue because
* the CAS to place it on queue can fail. So we have to
* traverse from tail to make sure it actually made it. It
* will always be near the tail in calls to this method, and
* unless the CAS failed (which is unlikely), it will be
* there, so we hardly ever traverse much.
*/
return findNodeFromTail(node);
}
/**
* Returns true if node is on sync queue by searching backwards from tail.
* Called only when needed by isOnSyncQueue.
* @return true if present
*/
private boolean findNodeFromTail(Node node) {
Node t = tail;
for (;;) {
if (t == node)
return true;
if (t == null)
return false;
t = t.prev;
}
}
/**
* Transfers a node from a condition queue onto sync queue.
* Returns true if successful.
* 將一個節點從condition隊列轉換到sync隊列
*
* @param node the node
* @return true if successfully transferred (else the node was
* cancelled before signal)
*/
final boolean transferForSignal(Node node) {
/*
* If cannot change waitStatus, the node has been cancelled.
*/
if (!compareAndSetWaitStatus(node, Node.CONDITION, 0))
return false;
/*
* Splice onto queue and try to set waitStatus of predecessor to
* indicate that thread is (probably) waiting. If cancelled or
* attempt to set waitStatus fails, wake up to resync (in which
* case the waitStatus can be transiently and harmlessly wrong).
*/
Node p = enq(node);
int ws = p.waitStatus;
if (ws > 0 || !compareAndSetWaitStatus(p, ws, Node.SIGNAL))
LockSupport.unpark(node.thread);
return true;
}
/**
* Transfers node, if necessary, to sync queue after a cancelled wait.
* Returns true if thread was cancelled before being signalled.
*
* @param node the node
* @return true if cancelled before the node was signalled
*/
final boolean transferAfterCancelledWait(Node node) {
if (compareAndSetWaitStatus(node, Node.CONDITION, 0)) {
enq(node);
return true;
}
/*
* If we lost out to a signal(), then we can't proceed
* until it finishes its enq(). Cancelling during an
* incomplete transfer is both rare and transient, so just
* spin.
*/
while (!isOnSyncQueue(node))
Thread.yield();
return false;
}
/**
* Invokes release with current state value; returns saved state.
* Cancels node and throws exception on failure.
* @param node the condition node for this wait
* @return previous sync state
*/
final int fullyRelease(Node node) {
boolean failed = true;
try {
int savedState = getState();
if (release(savedState)) {
failed = false;
return savedState;
} else {
throw new IllegalMonitorStateException();
}
} finally {
if (failed)
node.waitStatus = Node.CANCELLED;
}
}
// Instrumentation methods for conditions
/**
* Queries whether the given ConditionObject
* uses this synchronizer as its lock.
*
* @param condition the condition
* @return {@code true} if owned
* @throws NullPointerException if the condition is null
*/
public final boolean owns(ConditionObject condition) {
return condition.isOwnedBy(this);
}
/**
* Queries whether any threads are waiting on the given condition
* associated with this synchronizer. Note that because timeouts
* and interrupts may occur at any time, a {@code true} return
* does not guarantee that a future {@code signal} will awaken
* any threads. This method is designed primarily for use in
* monitoring of the system state.
*
* @param condition the condition
* @return {@code true} if there are any waiting threads
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if exclusive synchronization
* is not held
* @throws IllegalArgumentException if the given condition is
* not associated with this synchronizer
* @throws NullPointerException if the condition is null
*/
public final boolean hasWaiters(ConditionObject condition) {
if (!owns(condition))
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Not owner");
return condition.hasWaiters();
}
/**
* Returns an estimate of the number of threads waiting on the
* given condition associated with this synchronizer. Note that
* because timeouts and interrupts may occur at any time, the
* estimate serves only as an upper bound on the actual number of
* waiters. This method is designed for use in monitoring of the
* system state, not for synchronization control.
*
* @param condition the condition
* @return the estimated number of waiting threads
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if exclusive synchronization
* is not held
* @throws IllegalArgumentException if the given condition is
* not associated with this synchronizer
* @throws NullPointerException if the condition is null
*/
public final int getWaitQueueLength(ConditionObject condition) {
if (!owns(condition))
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Not owner");
return condition.getWaitQueueLength();
}
/**
* Returns a collection containing those threads that may be
* waiting on the given condition associated with this
* synchronizer. Because the actual set of threads may change
* dynamically while constructing this result, the returned
* collection is only a best-effort estimate. The elements of the
* returned collection are in no particular order.
*
* @param condition the condition
* @return the collection of threads
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if exclusive synchronization
* is not held
* @throws IllegalArgumentException if the given condition is
* not associated with this synchronizer
* @throws NullPointerException if the condition is null
*/
public final Collection<Thread> getWaitingThreads(ConditionObject condition) {
if (!owns(condition))
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Not owner");
return condition.getWaitingThreads();
}
/**
* Condition implementation for a {@link
* AbstractQueuedSynchronizer} serving as the basis of a {@link
* Lock} implementation.
*
* <p>Method documentation for this class describes mechanics,
* not behavioral specifications from the point of view of Lock
* and Condition users. Exported versions of this class will in
* general need to be accompanied by documentation describing
* condition semantics that rely on those of the associated
* {@code AbstractQueuedSynchronizer}.
*
* <p>This class is Serializable, but all fields are transient,
* so deserialized conditions have no waiters.
*/
public class ConditionObject implements Condition, java.io.Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1173984872572414699L;
/** First node of condition queue. */
private transient Node firstWaiter;
/** Last node of condition queue. */
private transient Node lastWaiter;
/**
* Creates a new {@code ConditionObject} instance.
*/
public ConditionObject() { }
// Internal methods
/**
* Adds a new waiter to wait queue.
* @return its new wait node
*/
private Node addConditionWaiter() {
Node t = lastWaiter;
// If lastWaiter is cancelled, clean out.
if (t != null && t.waitStatus != Node.CONDITION) {
unlinkCancelledWaiters();
t = lastWaiter;
}
Node node = new Node(Thread.currentThread(), Node.CONDITION);
if (t == null)
firstWaiter = node;
else
t.nextWaiter = node;
lastWaiter = node;
return node;
}
/**
* Removes and transfers nodes until hit non-cancelled one or
* null. Split out from signal in part to encourage compilers
* to inline the case of no waiters.
* @param first (non-null) the first node on condition queue
*/
private void doSignal(Node first) {
do {
if ( (firstWaiter = first.nextWaiter) == null)
lastWaiter = null;
first.nextWaiter = null;
} while (!transferForSignal(first) &&
(first = firstWaiter) != null);
}
/**
* Removes and transfers all nodes.
* @param first (non-null) the first node on condition queue
*/
private void doSignalAll(Node first) {
lastWaiter = firstWaiter = null;
do {
Node next = first.nextWaiter;
first.nextWaiter = null;
transferForSignal(first);
first = next;
} while (first != null);
}
/**
* Unlinks cancelled waiter nodes from condition queue.
* Called only while holding lock. This is called when
* cancellation occurred during condition wait, and upon
* insertion of a new waiter when lastWaiter is seen to have
* been cancelled. This method is needed to avoid garbage
* retention in the absence of signals. So even though it may
* require a full traversal, it comes into play only when
* timeouts or cancellations occur in the absence of
* signals. It traverses all nodes rather than stopping at a
* particular target to unlink all pointers to garbage nodes
* without requiring many re-traversals during cancellation
* storms.
*/
private void unlinkCancelledWaiters() {
Node t = firstWaiter;
Node trail = null;
while (t != null) {
Node next = t.nextWaiter;
if (t.waitStatus != Node.CONDITION) {
t.nextWaiter = null;
if (trail == null)
firstWaiter = next;
else
trail.nextWaiter = next;
if (next == null)
lastWaiter = trail;
}
else
trail = t;
t = next;
}
}
// public methods
/**
* Moves the longest-waiting thread, if one exists, from the wait queue for this condition to the wait queue for the owning lock.
*
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if {@link #isHeldExclusively}
* returns {@code false}
*/
public final void signal() {
if (!isHeldExclusively())
throw new IllegalMonitorStateException();
Node first = firstWaiter;
if (first != null)
doSignal(first);
}
/**
* Moves all threads from the wait queue for this condition to
* the wait queue for the owning lock.
*
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if {@link #isHeldExclusively}
* returns {@code false}
*/
public final void signalAll() {
if (!isHeldExclusively())
throw new IllegalMonitorStateException();
Node first = firstWaiter;
if (first != null)
doSignalAll(first);
}
/**
* Implements uninterruptible condition wait.
* <ol>
* <li> Save lock state returned by {@link #getState}.
* <li> Invoke {@link #release} with saved state as argument,
* throwing IllegalMonitorStateException if it fails.
* <li> Block until signalled.
* <li> Reacquire by invoking specialized version of
* {@link #acquire} with saved state as argument.
* </ol>
*/
public final void awaitUninterruptibly() {
Node node = addConditionWaiter();
int savedState = fullyRelease(node);
boolean interrupted = false;
while (!isOnSyncQueue(node)) {
LockSupport.park(this);
if (Thread.interrupted())
interrupted = true;
}
if (acquireQueued(node, savedState) || interrupted)
selfInterrupt();
}
/*
* For interruptible waits, we need to track whether to throw
* InterruptedException, if interrupted while blocked on
* condition, versus reinterrupt current thread, if
* interrupted while blocked waiting to re-acquire.
*/
/** Mode meaning to reinterrupt on exit from wait */
private static final int REINTERRUPT = 1;
/** Mode meaning to throw InterruptedException on exit from wait */
private static final int THROW_IE = -1;
/**
* Checks for interrupt, returning THROW_IE if interrupted
* before signalled, REINTERRUPT if after signalled, or
* 0 if not interrupted.
*/
private int checkInterruptWhileWaiting(Node node) {
return Thread.interrupted() ?
(transferAfterCancelledWait(node) ? THROW_IE : REINTERRUPT) :
0;
}
/**
* Throws InterruptedException, reinterrupts current thread, or
* does nothing, depending on mode.
*/
private void reportInterruptAfterWait(int interruptMode)
throws InterruptedException {
if (interruptMode == THROW_IE)
throw new InterruptedException();
else if (interruptMode == REINTERRUPT)
selfInterrupt();
}
/**
* Implements interruptible condition wait.
* <ol>
* <li> If current thread is interrupted, throw InterruptedException.
* <li> Save lock state returned by {@link #getState}.
* <li> Invoke {@link #release} with saved state as argument,
* throwing IllegalMonitorStateException if it fails.
* <li> Block until signalled or interrupted.
* <li> Reacquire by invoking specialized version of
* {@link #acquire} with saved state as argument.
* <li> If interrupted while blocked in step 4, throw InterruptedException.
* </ol>
*/
public final void await() throws InterruptedException {
if (Thread.interrupted())
throw new InterruptedException();
Node node = addConditionWaiter();
int savedState = fullyRelease(node);
int interruptMode = 0;
while (!isOnSyncQueue(node)) {
LockSupport.park(this);
if ((interruptMode = checkInterruptWhileWaiting(node)) != 0)
break;
}
if (acquireQueued(node, savedState) && interruptMode != THROW_IE)
interruptMode = REINTERRUPT;
if (node.nextWaiter != null) // clean up if cancelled
unlinkCancelledWaiters();
if (interruptMode != 0)
reportInterruptAfterWait(interruptMode);
}
/**
* Implements timed condition wait.
* <ol>
* <li> If current thread is interrupted, throw InterruptedException.
* <li> Save lock state returned by {@link #getState}.
* <li> Invoke {@link #release} with saved state as argument,
* throwing IllegalMonitorStateException if it fails.
* <li> Block until signalled, interrupted, or timed out.
* <li> Reacquire by invoking specialized version of
* {@link #acquire} with saved state as argument.
* <li> If interrupted while blocked in step 4, throw InterruptedException.
* </ol>
*/
public final long awaitNanos(long nanosTimeout)
throws InterruptedException {
if (Thread.interrupted())
throw new InterruptedException();
Node node = addConditionWaiter();
int savedState = fullyRelease(node);
final long deadline = System.nanoTime() + nanosTimeout;
int interruptMode = 0;
while (!isOnSyncQueue(node)) {
if (nanosTimeout <= 0L) {
transferAfterCancelledWait(node);
break;
}
if (nanosTimeout >= spinForTimeoutThreshold)
LockSupport.parkNanos(this, nanosTimeout);
if ((interruptMode = checkInterruptWhileWaiting(node)) != 0)
break;
nanosTimeout = deadline - System.nanoTime();
}
if (acquireQueued(node, savedState) && interruptMode != THROW_IE)
interruptMode = REINTERRUPT;
if (node.nextWaiter != null)
unlinkCancelledWaiters();
if (interruptMode != 0)
reportInterruptAfterWait(interruptMode);
return deadline - System.nanoTime();
}
/**
* Implements absolute timed condition wait.
* <ol>
* <li> If current thread is interrupted, throw InterruptedException.
* <li> Save lock state returned by {@link #getState}.
* <li> Invoke {@link #release} with saved state as argument,
* throwing IllegalMonitorStateException if it fails.
* <li> Block until signalled, interrupted, or timed out.
* <li> Reacquire by invoking specialized version of
* {@link #acquire} with saved state as argument.
* <li> If interrupted while blocked in step 4, throw InterruptedException.
* <li> If timed out while blocked in step 4, return false, else true.
* </ol>
*/
public final boolean awaitUntil(Date deadline)
throws InterruptedException {
long abstime = deadline.getTime();
if (Thread.interrupted())
throw new InterruptedException();
Node node = addConditionWaiter();
int savedState = fullyRelease(node);
boolean timedout = false;
int interruptMode = 0;
while (!isOnSyncQueue(node)) {
if (System.currentTimeMillis() > abstime) {
timedout = transferAfterCancelledWait(node);
break;
}
LockSupport.parkUntil(this, abstime);
if ((interruptMode = checkInterruptWhileWaiting(node)) != 0)
break;
}
if (acquireQueued(node, savedState) && interruptMode != THROW_IE)
interruptMode = REINTERRUPT;
if (node.nextWaiter != null)
unlinkCancelledWaiters();
if (interruptMode != 0)
reportInterruptAfterWait(interruptMode);
return !timedout;
}
/**
* Implements timed condition wait.
* <ol>
* <li> If current thread is interrupted, throw InterruptedException.
* <li> Save lock state returned by {@link #getState}.
* <li> Invoke {@link #release} with saved state as argument,
* throwing IllegalMonitorStateException if it fails.
* <li> Block until signalled, interrupted, or timed out.
* <li> Reacquire by invoking specialized version of
* {@link #acquire} with saved state as argument.
* <li> If interrupted while blocked in step 4, throw InterruptedException.
* <li> If timed out while blocked in step 4, return false, else true.
* </ol>
*/
public final boolean await(long time, TimeUnit unit)
throws InterruptedException {
long nanosTimeout = unit.toNanos(time);
if (Thread.interrupted())
throw new InterruptedException();
Node node = addConditionWaiter();
int savedState = fullyRelease(node);
final long deadline = System.nanoTime() + nanosTimeout;
boolean timedout = false;
int interruptMode = 0;
while (!isOnSyncQueue(node)) {
if (nanosTimeout <= 0L) {
timedout = transferAfterCancelledWait(node);
break;
}
if (nanosTimeout >= spinForTimeoutThreshold)
LockSupport.parkNanos(this, nanosTimeout);
if ((interruptMode = checkInterruptWhileWaiting(node)) != 0)
break;
nanosTimeout = deadline - System.nanoTime();
}
if (acquireQueued(node, savedState) && interruptMode != THROW_IE)
interruptMode = REINTERRUPT;
if (node.nextWaiter != null)
unlinkCancelledWaiters();
if (interruptMode != 0)
reportInterruptAfterWait(interruptMode);
return !timedout;
}
// support for instrumentation
/**
* Returns true if this condition was created by the given
* synchronization object.
*
* @return {@code true} if owned
*/
final boolean isOwnedBy(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer sync) {
return sync == AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.this;
}
/**
* Queries whether any threads are waiting on this condition.
* Implements {@link AbstractQueuedSynchronizer#hasWaiters(ConditionObject)}.
*
* @return {@code true} if there are any waiting threads
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if {@link #isHeldExclusively}
* returns {@code false}
*/
protected final boolean hasWaiters() {
if (!isHeldExclusively())
throw new IllegalMonitorStateException();
for (Node w = firstWaiter; w != null; w = w.nextWaiter) {
if (w.waitStatus == Node.CONDITION)
return true;
}
return false;
}
/**
* Returns an estimate of the number of threads waiting on
* this condition.
* Implements {@link AbstractQueuedSynchronizer#getWaitQueueLength(ConditionObject)}.
*
* @return the estimated number of waiting threads
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if {@link #isHeldExclusively}
* returns {@code false}
*/
protected final int getWaitQueueLength() {
if (!isHeldExclusively())
throw new IllegalMonitorStateException();
int n = 0;
for (Node w = firstWaiter; w != null; w = w.nextWaiter) {
if (w.waitStatus == Node.CONDITION)
++n;
}
return n;
}
/**
* Returns a collection containing those threads that may be
* waiting on this Condition.
* Implements {@link AbstractQueuedSynchronizer#getWaitingThreads(ConditionObject)}.
*
* @return the collection of threads
* @throws IllegalMonitorStateException if {@link #isHeldExclusively}
* returns {@code false}
*/
protected final Collection<Thread> getWaitingThreads() {
if (!isHeldExclusively())
throw new IllegalMonitorStateException();
ArrayList<Thread> list = new ArrayList<Thread>();
for (Node w = firstWaiter; w != null; w = w.nextWaiter) {
if (w.waitStatus == Node.CONDITION) {
Thread t = w.thread;
if (t != null)
list.add(t);
}
}
return list;
}
}
/**
* Setup to support compareAndSet. We need to natively implement
* this here: For the sake of permitting future enhancements, we
* cannot explicitly subclass AtomicInteger, which would be
* efficient and useful otherwise. So, as the lesser of evils, we
* natively implement using hotspot intrinsics API. And while we
* are at it, we do the same for other CASable fields (which could
* otherwise be done with atomic field updaters).
*/
private static final Unsafe unsafe = Unsafe.getUnsafe();
private static final long stateOffset;
private static final long headOffset;
private static final long tailOffset;
private static final long waitStatusOffset;
private static final long nextOffset;
static {
try {
stateOffset = unsafe.objectFieldOffset
(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.class.getDeclaredField("state"));
headOffset = unsafe.objectFieldOffset
(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.class.getDeclaredField("head"));
tailOffset = unsafe.objectFieldOffset
(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.class.getDeclaredField("tail"));
waitStatusOffset = unsafe.objectFieldOffset
(Node.class.getDeclaredField("waitStatus"));
nextOffset = unsafe.objectFieldOffset
(Node.class.getDeclaredField("next"));
} catch (Exception ex) { throw new Error(ex); }
}
/**
* CAS head field. Used only by enq.
*/
private final boolean compareAndSetHead(Node update) {
return unsafe.compareAndSwapObject(this, headOffset, null, update);
}
/**
* CAS tail field. Used only by enq.
*/
private final boolean compareAndSetTail(Node expect, Node update) {
return unsafe.compareAndSwapObject(this, tailOffset, expect, update);
}
/**
* CAS waitStatus field of a node.
*/
private static final boolean compareAndSetWaitStatus(Node node,
int expect,
int update) {
return unsafe.compareAndSwapInt(node, waitStatusOffset,
expect, update);
}
/**
* CAS next field of a node.
*/
private static final boolean compareAndSetNext(Node node,
Node expect,
Node update) {
return unsafe.compareAndSwapObject(node, nextOffset, expect, update);
}
}
jdk1.8 AbstractQueuedSynchronizer源碼解析
發表評論
所有評論
還沒有人評論，想成為第一個評論的人麼? 請在上方評論欄輸入並且點擊發布.
相關文章
Java生成PDF文件，並將PDF轉爲圖片
引入依賴 <dependency> <groupId>com.itextpdf</groupId> <artifactId>itextpdf</artifactId>