再谈Hibernate the owing session was closed

ERROR] - could not initialize proxy - the owning Session was closed - [org.hibernate.LazyInitializationException.<init>(LazyInitializationException.java:19)]

用结合spring 使用hibernate都会遇到的问题, 为了避免多余的关联查询, lazy loading的引入, 但是通常持久层会把session关闭了, render view的时候PO 里面的session其实已经关闭了, 再load其他关联属性, 异常就出来了.

 

单独使用hibernate的事务管理吧. http://www.hibernate.org/42.html

 

 

 以下讨论话题都是基于Spring + Hibernate配套使用.

 

1. session在哪里给关闭了?

(1) 假设没有配置OpenSessionInViewFilter, 以及HibernateTransactionManager,AOP任何事务。 我们只是使用HibernateTemplate 在DAO层里做若干次查询操作, 跟踪日志.

2009-03-11 14:28:51,759 [DEBUG] - #{genericFO.signIn} - [com....web.AccessControlActionListenerImpl.preProcessAction(AccessControlActionListenerImpl.java:66)]
2009-03-11 14:28:52,259 [DEBUG] - Opening Hibernate Session - [org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.SessionFactoryUtils.doGetSession(SessionFactoryUtils.java:316)]
2009-03-11 14:28:52,852 [DEBUG] - Eagerly flushing Hibernate session - [org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateAccessor.flushIfNecessary(HibernateAccessor.java:389)]
2009-03-11 14:28:52,868 [DEBUG] - Closing Hibernate Session - [org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.SessionFactoryUtils.closeSession(SessionFactoryUtils.java:772)]
2009-03-11 14:28:52,899 [DEBUG] - Opening Hibernate Session - [org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.SessionFactoryUtils.doGetSession(SessionFactoryUtils.java:316)]
2009-03-11 14:28:53,040 [DEBUG] - Eagerly flushing Hibernate session - [org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateAccessor.flushIfNecessary(HibernateAccessor.java:389)]
2009-03-11 14:28:53,040 [DEBUG] - Closing Hibernate Session - [org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.SessionFactoryUtils.closeSession(SessionFactoryUtils.java:772)]
2009-03-11 14:28:53,056 [ERROR] - could not initialize proxy - the owning Session was closed - [org.hibernate.LazyInitializationException.<init>(LazyInitializationException.java:19)]

 

SessionFactoryUtils line 316

  logger.debug("Opening Hibernate Session");
  Session session = (entityInterceptor != null ?
    sessionFactory.openSession(entityInterceptor) : sessionFactory.openSession());

 可以跟一下实现类SessionFactoryImpl, openSession可是每次new 一个Session。

 private SessionImpl openSession(
  Connection connection,
     boolean autoClose,
     long timestamp,
     Interceptor sessionLocalInterceptor
 ) {
  return new SessionImpl(
          connection,
          this,
          autoClose,
          timestamp,
          sessionLocalInterceptor == null ? interceptor : sessionLocalInterceptor,
          settings.getDefaultEntityMode(),
          settings.isFlushBeforeCompletionEnabled(),
          settings.isAutoCloseSessionEnabled(),
          settings.getConnectionReleaseMode()
   );
 }

SessionFactory的openSession和getCurrentSession区别比较大的, 一般currentSession有个实现是和threadLocal绑定的, 也就是说每个请求多次查询数据库可能使用的都是同一个session.

心疼了吧, 什么都不配置直接使用HibernateTemplate是比较耗的.  而且currentSession的实现在事务之后会保证session关闭(至少CurrentSessionContext这个接口是这样定义的)

 

顺便瞄一下HibernateTemplate查询调用的代码吧.

 /**
  * Execute the action specified by the given action object within a Session.
  * @param action callback object that specifies the Hibernate action
  * @param exposeNativeSession whether to expose the native Hibernate Session
  * to callback code
  * @return a result object returned by the action, or <code>null</code>
  * @throws org.springframework.dao.DataAccessException in case of Hibernate errors
  */
 public Object execute(HibernateCallback action, boolean exposeNativeSession) throws DataAccessException {
  Assert.notNull(action, "Callback object must not be null");

  Session session = getSession();//每次都是openSession, 因为ThreadLocal没同一个事务的session
  boolean existingTransaction = SessionFactoryUtils.isSessionTransactional(session, getSessionFactory());//为false, 因为threadLocal没有session
  if (existingTransaction) {
   logger.debug("Found thread-bound Session for HibernateTemplate");
  }

  FlushMode previousFlushMode = null;
  try {
   previousFlushMode = applyFlushMode(session, existingTransaction);
   enableFilters(session);
   Session sessionToExpose = (exposeNativeSession ? session : createSessionProxy(session));
   Object result = action.doInHibernate(sessionToExpose);
   flushIfNecessary(session, existingTransaction);
   return result;
  }
  catch (HibernateException ex) {
   throw convertHibernateAccessException(ex);
  }
  catch (SQLException ex) {
   throw convertJdbcAccessException(ex);
  }
  catch (RuntimeException ex) {
   // Callback code threw application exception...
   throw ex;
  }
  finally {
   if (existingTransaction) {
    logger.debug("Not closing pre-bound Hibernate Session after HibernateTemplate");
    disableFilters(session);
    if (previousFlushMode != null) {
     session.setFlushMode(previousFlushMode);
    }
   }
   else {
    // Never use deferred close for an explicitly new Session.
    if (isAlwaysUseNewSession()) {//默认配置alwaysUseNewSession=false
     SessionFactoryUtils.closeSession(session);
    }
    else {//每次都在这里关闭
     SessionFactoryUtils.closeSessionOrRegisterDeferredClose(session, getSessionFactory());
    }
   }
  }
 }

 

(2) 那我们代码事务或用AOP配置的声明事务看下,主要就是看下HibernateTransactionmanager的使用了其实。假设使用的是TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_REQUIRED

public final TransactionStatus getTransaction(TransactionDefinition definition) {

}

void commit(TransactionStatus status) {

 ..processCommit(DefaultTransactionStatus status);...

}

processCommit(DefaultTransactionStatus status) {...

  finally {
   cleanupAfterCompletion(status);
  }

}

 private void cleanupAfterCompletion(DefaultTransactionStatus status) {
  status.setCompleted();
  if (status.isNewSynchronization()) {
   TransactionSynchronizationManager.clear();
  }
  if (status.isNewTransaction()) {
   doCleanupAfterCompletion(status.getTransaction());
  }
  if (status.getSuspendedResources() != null) {
   if (status.isDebug()) {
    logger.debug("Resuming suspended transaction");
   }
   resume(status.getTransaction(), (SuspendedResourcesHolder) status.getSuspendedResources());
  }
 }

 

其实调用的是Hibernate Session的Transaction, 默认的应该就是JDBCTransaction

 

 protected void doCleanupAfterCompletion(Object transaction) {
  HibernateTransactionObject txObject = (HibernateTransactionObject) transaction;

  // Remove the session holder from the thread.
  if (txObject.isNewSessionHolder()) {
   TransactionSynchronizationManager.unbindResource(getSessionFactory());
  }

  // Remove the JDBC connection holder from the thread, if exposed.
  if (getDataSource() != null) {
   TransactionSynchronizationManager.unbindResource(getDataSource());
  }

  Session session = txObject.getSessionHolder().getSession();
  if (this.prepareConnection && session.isConnected() && isSameConnectionForEntireSession(session)) {
   // We're running with connection release mode "on_close": We're able to reset
   // the isolation level and/or read-only flag of the JDBC Connection here.
   // Else, we need to rely on the connection pool to perform proper cleanup.
   try {
    Connection con = session.connection();
    DataSourceUtils.resetConnectionAfterTransaction(con, txObject.getPreviousIsolationLevel());
   }
   catch (HibernateException ex) {
    logger.debug("Could not access JDBC Connection of Hibernate Session", ex);
   }
  }

  if (txObject.isNewSessionHolder()) {//如果没用OpenSessionInViewFilter,这个txObject是newSessionHolder=true,否则为false
   if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
    logger.debug("Closing Hibernate Session [" + SessionFactoryUtils.toString(session) +
      "] after transaction");
   }//deferredClose空,所以还是关了session
   SessionFactoryUtils.closeSessionOrRegisterDeferredClose(session, getSessionFactory());
  }
  else {
   if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
    logger.debug("Not closing pre-bound Hibernate Session [" +
      SessionFactoryUtils.toString(session) + "] after transaction");
   }
   if (txObject.getSessionHolder().getPreviousFlushMode() != null) {
    session.setFlushMode(txObject.getSessionHolder().getPreviousFlushMode());
   }
   if (hibernateSetTimeoutAvailable) {
    // Running against Hibernate 3.1+...
    // Let's explicitly disconnect the Session to provide efficient Connection handling
    // even with connection release mode "on_close". The Session will automatically
    // obtain a new Connection in case of further database access.
    // Couldn't do this on Hibernate 3.0, where disconnect required a manual reconnect.
    session.disconnect();
   }
  }
  txObject.getSessionHolder().clear();
 }

 可以简单这样认为, 由于事务是新的(因为ThreadLocal的SessionHolder是新创的,事先不存在), 事务完成后session还是关了.

 

 

其实session关了是好习惯啊,就好像用完了连接就关闭一样。

 

2. 怎么让session在view也是active?

OpenSessionInViewFilter,

 

 protected void doFilterInternal(
   HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response, FilterChain filterChain)
   throws ServletException, IOException {

  SessionFactory sessionFactory = lookupSessionFactory(request);
  boolean participate = false;

  if (isSingleSession()) {
   // single session mode
   if (TransactionSynchronizationManager.hasResource(sessionFactory)) {
    // Do not modify the Session: just set the participate flag.
    participate = true;
   }
   else {
    logger.debug("Opening single Hibernate Session in OpenSessionInViewFilter");
    Session session = getSession(sessionFactory);
    TransactionSynchronizationManager.bindResource(sessionFactory, new SessionHolder(session));

//ThreadLocal保存一个SessionHolder, 之后在事务HibernateTransactionManager中就认为NewSessionHolder=false, 清理的时候就关不了session了; 
   }
  }
  else {
   // deferred close mode
   if (SessionFactoryUtils.isDeferredCloseActive(sessionFactory)) {
    // Do not modify deferred close: just set the participate flag.
    participate = true;
   }
   else {
    SessionFactoryUtils.initDeferredClose(sessionFactory);
   }
  }

  try {
   filterChain.doFilter(request, response);//下一个filter, 如果没filter就是要采访的jsp/servlet了
  }

  finally {
   if (!participate) {
    if (isSingleSession()) {
     // single session mode
     SessionHolder sessionHolder =
       (SessionHolder) TransactionSynchronizationManager.unbindResource(sessionFactory);
     logger.debug("Closing single Hibernate Session in OpenSessionInViewFilter");
     closeSession(sessionHolder.getSession(), sessionFactory);
    }
    else {
     // deferred close mode
     SessionFactoryUtils.processDeferredClose(sessionFactory);
    }
   }
  }
 }

 

很多人说的一个诟病就是session跨多个层, 特别是在页面渲染的时候, 写到客户端时pending时间长, session资源没及时释放, 或者有一定的道理, 很可惜没看到数据证明。

 

老实说, 这么一个问题的引入也证明一点, 没什么框架是完美的真那么傻瓜的, 适合使用, 简单就好。

Hibernate也只是我们项目中持久层的一个应用框架.

 

 

發表評論
所有評論
還沒有人評論,想成為第一個評論的人麼? 請在上方評論欄輸入並且點擊發布.
相關文章