基於 Postgres 實現一個熱度算法

Web開發會經常遇到給實體打分的需求,比如論壇用戶的聲望分、電商系統的類目和產品熱度分,新聞的熱度分等。有些分數只需要排序使用,有些分數需要顯示給用戶,讓用戶看到分數之後能直觀的感受到這個分數所處的位置。往往熱度分的計算並不只是參考單一維度,會有很多維度的參考。比如,如果我們想計算一個論壇的用戶的綜合貢獻值,需要參考回帖數量、發帖數量、被點贊數量等指標。下面以論壇用戶貢獻值爲例子來演示一個熱度分的計算過程。

首先,初始化一個用戶表,200條記錄,字段爲id,post_count, reply_count, faver_count,值爲隨機整數。

    SELECT row_number() over() as id, 
           (generate_series * random())::integer as post_count, 
           (generate_series * random())::integer as reply_count, 
           (generate_series * random())::integer as faver_count
INTO TABLE users
      FROM (SELECT * FROM generate_series(1, 200)) AS r;

users表數據如下:

select * from users limit 10;
 id | post_count | reply_count | faver_count
----+------------+-------------+-------------
  1 |          0 |           0 |           0
  2 |          2 |           1 |           1
  3 |          2 |           2 |           1
  4 |          3 |           0 |           1
  5 |          3 |           3 |           4
  6 |          4 |           3 |           3
  7 |          4 |           0 |           3
  8 |          5 |           4 |           3
  9 |          7 |           2 |           5
 10 |          6 |           3 |           5

Row Number

最簡單的想法是單指標的排名相加,比如,按post_count從大到小排序,算出post_numreplyfaver同理:


SELECT *,
       row_number() over(order by post_count desc) as post_num, 
       row_number() over(order by reply_count desc) as reply_num, 
       row_number() over(order by faver_count desc) as faver_num  
  FROM users;

計算結果如下,score = a * post_num + b * reply_num + c * faver_num,其中abc爲加權係數。這樣的計算方法存在一個問題,score的範圍不確定,一個用戶打了99分的話,我們無法從99這個數值看出他處於什麼位置。


id  | post_count | reply_count | faver_count | post_num | reply_num | faver_num
-----+------------+-------------+-------------+----------+-----------+-----------
 187 |         62 |          25 |         173 |       70 |       122 |         1
 169 |          6 |          57 |         167 |      176 |        69 |         2
 171 |          2 |          46 |         162 |      193 |        84 |         3
 172 |         41 |         152 |         162 |      101 |         6 |         4
 200 |         76 |         193 |         149 |       51 |         1 |         5
 156 |         62 |         116 |         144 |       69 |        28 |         6
 166 |        114 |          31 |         144 |       20 |       109 |         7
 153 |        127 |          97 |         138 |       10 |        39 |         8
 135 |         25 |         131 |         135 |      135 |        16 |         9
 186 |        112 |         147 |         134 |       23 |         7 |        10
 163 |        106 |         134 |         133 |       28 |        13 |        11
 155 |        124 |           3 |         132 |       14 |       188 |        12
 173 |         74 |          92 |         132 |       53 |        42 |        13
 133 |        119 |          78 |         132 |       17 |        53 |        14

NTile

一個改進的方案是,排名之後按區間分段,比如1-10打1分,11-20打2分,以此類推。這樣可以把每個指標的範圍確定,再加權之後範圍也是可以計算的。

SELECT *,
       ntile(10) over(order by post_count desc) as post_num, 
       ntile(10) over(order by reply_count desc) as reply_num, 
       ntile(10) over(order by faver_count desc) as faver_num  
  FROM users;

按區間分段存在的問題是,結果不夠平滑,也不能反映不同用戶之間的差別,比如第一名和第二名分別爲10000和100,分段之後他們得到相同的分數,體現不出差異。


id  | post_count | reply_count | faver_count | post_num | reply_num | faver_num
-----+------------+-------------+-------------+----------+-----------+-----------
 187 |         62 |          25 |         173 |        4 |         7 |         1
 169 |          6 |          57 |         167 |        9 |         4 |         1
 171 |          2 |          46 |         162 |       10 |         5 |         1
 172 |         41 |         152 |         162 |        6 |         1 |         1
 200 |         76 |         193 |         149 |        3 |         1 |         1
 156 |         62 |         116 |         144 |        4 |         2 |         1
 166 |        114 |          31 |         144 |        1 |         6 |         1
 153 |        127 |          97 |         138 |        1 |         2 |         1
 135 |         25 |         131 |         135 |        7 |         1 |         1
 186 |        112 |         147 |         134 |        2 |         1 |         1
 163 |        106 |         134 |         133 |        2 |         1 |         1
 155 |        124 |           3 |         132 |        1 |        10 |         1
 173 |         74 |          92 |         132 |        3 |         3 |         1
 133 |        119 |          78 |         132 |        1 |         3 |         1
 174 |         42 |          14 |         131 |        5 |         8 |         1
 181 |        120 |          10 |         130 |        1 |         8 |         1
 148 |         38 |         120 |         129 |        6 |         2 |         1
 176 |         84 |         105 |         128 |        3 |         2 |         1
 128 |        113 |         103 |         128 |        2 |         2 |         1
 179 |        114 |         118 |         127 |        1 |         2 |         1
 157 |         66 |         120 |         127 |        4 |         2 |         2
 198 |        122 |          35 |         126 |        1 |         6 |         2
 195 |        166 |         112 |         118 |        1 |         2 |         2
 192 |        175 |         124 |         117 |        1 |         1 |         2

Z Score

標準分數(Standard Score,又稱z-score,中文稱爲Z-分數或標準化值)在統計學中是一種無因次值,就是一種純數字標記,是藉由從單一(原始)分數中減去母體的平均值,再依照母體(母集合)的標準差分割成不同的差距,按照z值公式,各個樣本在經過轉換後,通常在正、負五到六之間不等。

WITH post AS (SELECT avg(post_count) as mean, stddev(post_count) as sd from users),
     reply AS (SELECT avg(reply_count) as mean, stddev(reply_count) as sd from users),
     faver AS (SELECT avg(faver_count) as mean, stddev(faver_count) as sd from users)
SELECT users.*,
       ((post_count - post.mean) / post.sd)::numeric(6,3) AS z_score_post,
       ((reply_count - reply.mean) / reply.sd)::numeric(6,3) AS z_score_reply,
       ((faver_count - faver.mean) / faver.sd)::numeric(6,3) AS z_score_faver
  FROM users,
       post,
       faver,
       reply
ORDER BY 4 DESC

結果如下:


id  | post_count | reply_count | faver_count | z_score_post | z_score_reply | z_score_faver
-----+------------+-------------+-------------+--------------+---------------+---------------
 187 |         62 |          25 |         173 |        0.251 |        -0.543 |         2.835
 169 |          6 |          57 |         167 |       -1.076 |         0.150 |         2.697
 172 |         41 |         152 |         162 |       -0.247 |         2.208 |         2.582
 171 |          2 |          46 |         162 |       -1.171 |        -0.088 |         2.582
 200 |         76 |         193 |         149 |        0.582 |         3.096 |         2.283
 156 |         62 |         116 |         144 |        0.251 |         1.428 |         2.168
 166 |        114 |          31 |         144 |        1.483 |        -0.413 |         2.168
 153 |        127 |          97 |         138 |        1.791 |         1.016 |         2.031
 135 |         25 |         131 |         135 |       -0.626 |         1.753 |         1.962
 186 |        112 |         147 |         134 |        1.435 |         2.099 |         1.939
 163 |        106 |         134 |         133 |        1.293 |         1.818 |         1.916
 133 |        119 |          78 |         132 |        1.601 |         0.605 |         1.893
 173 |         74 |          92 |         132 |        0.535 |         0.908 |         1.893
 155 |        124 |           3 |         132 |        1.720 |        -1.019 |         1.893
 174 |         42 |          14 |         131 |       -0.223 |        -0.781 |         1.870
 181 |        120 |          10 |         130 |        1.625 |        -0.868 |         1.847
 148 |         38 |         120 |         129 |       -0.318 |         1.515 |         1.824
 128 |        113 |         103 |         128 |        1.459 |         1.146 |         1.801
 176 |         84 |         105 |         128 |        0.772 |         1.190 |         1.801
 179 |        114 |         118 |         127 |        1.483 |         1.471 |         1.778

Z-Score的意義是樣本值到均值之間有多少個標準差,它的取值理論上也是沒有範圍的,但如果樣本數值服從正態分佈,會有99%以上的值落在[-3, 3]這個區間。如圖:

其實從上面我們計算的結果也可以觀察出這個結論。對於落在[-3, 3]區間外的數據,我們可以調整爲3或-3,這個影響完全可以忽略不計。使用Z-Score之後,我們可以保證了分數值既平滑又有範圍區間。

Links

發表評論
所有評論
還沒有人評論,想成為第一個評論的人麼? 請在上方評論欄輸入並且點擊發布.
相關文章