extjs雖然是免費開源的，但他有兩種license的使用方式，如果是lgpl的方式，意味着你的產品必須開源，或者向ext購買license，因此使用的時候 要特別注意了，
Developer License
Allows for a single developer to install and use Ext JS on unlimited workstations for development and to deploy Ext JS on unlimited domains and sub-domains on unlimited servers.
上文說的"deploy"就是你說的"發佈"，就是說可以發佈到任意機器和任意域名上，也就是可以發佈無數份拷貝
唯一的限制就是 single developer，每份協議只允許一個開發人員
你的團隊要是有3個人使用ext來開發，就要出 298$ * 3 的錢
因此單純的298￥應該 是沒問題的，但我公司有幾十個，甚至幾百，幾千個人用，那我的代價就大了。
下面是ext網站的論壇描述：
![Default]( "Default")
License Change?
Developer License
Allows for a single developer to install and use Ext JS on unlimited workstations for development and to deploy Ext JS on unlimited domains and sub-domains on unlimited servers.
上文說的"deploy"就是你說的"發佈"，就是說可以發佈到任意機器和任意域名上，也就是可以發佈無數份拷貝
唯一的限制就是 single developer，每份協議只允許一個開發人員
你的團隊要是有3個人使用ext來開發，就要出 298$ * 3 的錢
因此單純的298￥應該 是沒問題的，但我公司有幾十個，甚至幾百，幾千個人用，那我的代價就大了。
下面是ext網站的論壇描述：
License Change? When having a look at the new site, I'm a bit surprised to see a change in the terms of the license. ExtJS 2.01 and lower were LGPL licensed, but 2.1 is GPL licensed. I'm sure you know that this is a BIG change. Is this intentional or an oversight? I really wouldn't want to see a fork in the community caused by this change of license.
|
#2
 04-21-2008, 05:21 AM |
||||
|
||||
|
This was an intentional change. Details can be found here: http://extjs.com/company/dual.php
We'll have more to say about this soon... __________________
Brian Moeskau Ext JS - Core Development Team FAQ / Tutorials / User Extensions / Enhanced Forum Search |
<script type="text/javascript"> vbmenu_register("postmenu_155879", true); </script> 
|
#3
04-21-2008, 05:39 AM |
|||
|
|||
|
If I will not pay and publish I'm forced to use 2.02 which is still LGPL right?
|
|
#4
04-21-2008, 05:49 AM |
|||
|
|||
|
I think it's big bad news for us. I think it's one big bad news for us. ExtJS is great work,but i think this kind of license will stop up 90% of people to share this great work, and lost more and more ExtJS developer.
sorry for my pool english.  |
|
#5
04-21-2008, 07:21 AM |
|||
|
|||
|
Unfortunately I would have to agree. I have been using ExtJS for a long time now. this switch in license in my opinion is unfortunate, while I don't forsee myself not using this toolkit/library at this time, I still strongly disagree with this decision mainly because the GPL is VIRAL, if you use ExtJS in your app now, you must also license your app as GPL, which I dislike very much.
I would still like to applaud Jack and the rest on their work and thank you for your continued work, but in my opinion this is not a good decision. __________________
|