說真的,本來我是想挑毛病的,結果人家用的數據很合理,方法也很合理,中國的創新指數確實不行,這反映了中國創新能力的低下.
建議：政府在政策上向創新方便便宜,不要再雷聲大雨點小了,那樣會傷了國人的心,也會傷了中國的根,不利於可持續發展；
商業與金融方面,請各位企業不要吝嗇於向學院和研究機構投入錢了,又不會花很多,持續的投入必定會帶來持續的產出.
Rank Country Score*
1 US 5.80
2 Germany 4.89
3 UK 4.81
4 Japan 4.48
5 France 4.32
6 Switzerland 4.16
7 Singapore 4.10
8 Canada 4.06
9 Netherlands 3.99
10 Hong Kong 3.97 //香港
11 Denmark 3.95
12 Sweden 3.90
13 Finland 3.85
14 UAE 3.81
15 Belgium 3.77
16 Luxembourg 3.72
17 Australia 3.71
18 Israel 3.68
19 South Korea 3.67
20 Iceland 3.66
21 Ireland 3.66
22 Austria 3.64
23 India 3.57
24 Italy 3.48
25 Norway 3.48
26 Malaysia 3.47
27 Spain 3.38
28 New Zealand 3.35
29 China 3.21
30 Kuwait 3.14
31 Estonia 3.12
32 Czech Republic 3.10
33 Chile 3.03
34 Thailand 3.01
35 Slovak Republic 2.97
36 Hungary 2.88
37 Mexico 2.88
38 South Africa 2.87
39 Portugal 2.86
40 Brazil 2.84
41 Tunisia 2.84
42 Malta 2.82
43 Slovenia 2.81
44 Barbados 2.79
45 Turkey 2.75
46 Cyprus 2.73
47 Lithuania 2.71
48 Indonesia 2.71
49 Greece 2.69
50 Latvia 2.67
51 Costa Rica 2.66
52 Jamaica 2.63
53 Jordan 2.61
54 Russian Federation 2.60
55 Croatia 2.59
56 Poland 2.53
57 Colombia 2.50
58 El Salvador 2.49
59 Panama 2.47
60 Mauritius 2.46
61 Kazakhstan 2.45
62 Romania 2.44
63 Argentina 2.41
64 Azerbaijan 2.40
65 Vietnam 2.38
66 Philippines 2.38
67 Uruguay 2.37
68 Guatemala 2.36
69 Peru 2.35
70 Dominican Republic 2.29
71 Sri Lanka 2.27
72 Nigeria 2.27
73 Pakistan 2.24
74 Egypt 2.24
75 Ukraine 2.24
76 Morocco 2.23
77 Venezuela 2.22
78 Kenya 2.22
79 Namibia 2.21
80 Tanzania 2.14
81 Bulgaria 2.12
82 Moldova 2.11
83 Algeria 2.11
84 Burkina Faso 2.10
85 Mongolia 2.08
86 Armenia 2.07
87 Macedonia 2.06
88 Uganda 2.05
89 Bosnia & Herzegovina 2.05
90 Ecuador 2.03
91 Honduras 2.02
92 Nicaragua 2.01
93 Georgia 2.00
94 Tajikistan 1.95
95 Cambodia 1.94
96 Cameroon 1.92
97 Guyana 1.84
98 Bangladesh 1.82
99 Nepal 1.79
100 Albania 1.78
101 Kyrgyzstan 1.76
102 Bolivia 1.72
103 Mozambique 1.72
104 Ethiopia 1.71
105 Lesotho 1.68
106 Paraguay 1.66
107 Angola 1.53
The framework groups the eight pillars of innovation into two categories: Inputs and Outputs.
The five Input pillars:
Institutions and Policies
Human Capacity
Infrastructure
Technological Sophistication
Business Markets and Capital
These represent aspects which enhance the capacity of a nation to generate ideas and leverage them for innovative products and services.
The three Output pillars:
Knowledge
Competitiveness
Wealth
These represent the ultimate benefits of innovation for a nation - more knowledge creation, increased competitiveness and greater wealth generation.
Each pillar of the GII model is measured by a number of quantitative and qualitative variables. The averaged scores for the Input and Output pillars together give an overall score - the Global Innovation Index.
Calculating the GII
The Global Innovation Index for any given country is calculated in the following manner:
1. The values of each variable for the country are scaled on a range of 1 to 7.
2. The values of all variables for the country under a particular pillar are averaged to yield a score from 1 to 7 for that pillar for the country.
3. The scores of all five Input pillars are averaged to give an overall score (on a scale of 1 to 7) of the country for the Input dimension.
4. The scores of all three Output pillars are averaged to give an overall score (on a scale of 1 to 7) of the country for the Output dimension.
5. The overall Input and Output scores (steps 3 and 4 respectively above) are averaged to yield the overall Global Innovation Index score (on a range of 1 to 7) for the country.
The five inputs and three outputs (our 'eight pillars'), by which countries' innovative capacity was measured, are listed in detail below.
INPUTS
Institutions and Policies
Independence of judiciary
Demanding regulatory standards
Prevalence of laws relating to ICT
Quality of IPR
Soundness of banks
Quality of scientific research institutions
Quality of management/business schools
Legal obstacles to foreign labour
Time required to start a business
Time required to obtain licenses
Rigidity of employment index
Investor protection index
ICT priority for government
Human Capacity
Brain drain
Quality of human resource approach
Quality of maths and science education
Graduates in engineering
Graduates in science
Population 15-64
Urban population
Schools connected to the internet
General and ICT Infrastructure
Quality of general infrastructure
Quality of national transport network
Quality of air transport
Fixed line penetration
Mobile penetration
Internet penetration
International bandwidth
ICT expenditure
Personal computer penetration
Mobile price basket
Business, Markets and Capital Flows
Access to loans
Sophistication of financial markets
Issuing shares in local share market
Corporate governance
Buyer sophistication
Customer orientation of firms
Domestic credit to private sector
FDI net inflows
Gross private capital flows
Gross capital formation
Extent of clusters
Commercial services imports
Manufactured Imports
Private investment in ICT
Informal economy estimate
Technology and Process Sophistication
Country's level of technology
E-Participation index
E-Government index
Government procurement of advanced technology
Internet use by businesses
Competition among ISP providers
Company technology absorption
Telecom revenue
Secure internet servers per 1,000 people
Spending on R&D
Royalty and license fee payments
Business/university R&D collaboration
OUTPUTS
Knowledge
Local specialized research and training
Nature of competitive advantage
Quality of production process technology
High-tech exports
Manufactured exports
ICT exports
Insurance and financial services
Patents registered (domestic and non-domestic)
Royalty and license fee receipts
Competitiveness
Growth of exports to neighboring countries
Intensity of local competition
Reach of exporting in international markets
Commercial services export
Merchandise exports
Goods exported
Service exports
Listed domestic companies
Wealth
Final consumption expenditure
GDP per capita, PPP
GDP growth rate
Industry, value added
Manufacturer, value added
Services, value added
International migration stock
Value of stocks traded
FDI net outflows
Globalisation has pushed innovation to the top of the agenda, but which countries respond best to the new challenges?
The World Business/INSEAD Global Innovation Index 2007 in association with BT.
Which nations and regions respond best to the challenge of innovation? In recent years, innovation has pushed itself to the very top of policy-making and senior executive agendas. What has put it there can be summed up in one word: globalisation. Now INSEAD and World Business have developed the Global Innovation Index (GII) to measure the shock of the new.
Innovation is about much more than generating new ideas. Translating these ideas into value- adding products and services requires flexibility of attitude and willingness to adapt to, and welcome, unprecedented levels of change on the part of individuals, organisations and society as a whole. So who is doing it best? What are the conditions for doing so? Can we pin down the catch-all notion of innovation in ways that can be quantified and normalised to generate meaningful comparisons?
It was to answer questions like these that World Business commissoned INSEAD Business School to develop the GII. Our starting point is the belief that response-readiness is directly linked to a country's ability to adopt, and benefit from, leading-edge technologies, expanded human capacities, better organisational and operational capability, and improved institutional performance.
As these larger issues suggest, the pressures of global innovation are already changing the face of the planet. Year by year, the index will chart how they do it.