前言
截止到目前，我也算是審了三篇文章了。結果分別是接受、拒絕、修改。也算是集齊了所有類型。
廢話不多說，開始正文。每部分該寫什麼。
1.總結：說明這篇文章主要提出了什麼，實驗結果如何。
2.優點。總結一些文章有哪些優點：比如實驗充分，idea很新。
3.缺點：比如結構不好，語法錯誤、格式錯誤、實驗不充分、論文結果不正確或者有重大失誤等等,最好舉出幾個詳細的例子。
4.總結一下：表達你的最終意見：比如接受、修改、拒絕。
常見錯誤積累
1、目標和結果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.2、未解釋研究方法或解釋不充分。
◆ In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical me
thods used in the study.
◆ Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments
should be provided.3、對於研究設計的rationale:
Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.4、誇張地陳述結論/誇大成果/不嚴謹：
The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show
if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、對hypothesis的清晰界定：
A hypothesis needs to be presented。6、對某個概念或工具使用的rationale/定義概念：
What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?7、對研究問題的定義：
Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear,
write one section to define the problem8、如何凸現原創性以及如何充分地寫literature review:
The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.
9、對claim,如A＞B的證明，verification:
There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.10、嚴謹度問題：
MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.11、格式（重視程度）：
◆ In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with "Instructions for Authors" which shows examples.
◆ Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, please consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the "Instructions and Forms" button in he upper right-hand corner of the screen.12、語言問題（出現最多的問題）：
有關語言的審稿人意見：
◆ It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.
◆ The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper translation/reviewing service before submission; only then can a proper review be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not complete sentences.
◆ As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are pro
blems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause construction.
◆ The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We str
ongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is well-versed i
n English or whose native language is English.
◆ Please have someone competent in the English language and the subject matte
r of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?
◆ the quality of English needs improving.
來自編輯的鼓勵：
Encouragement from reviewers:
◆ I would be very glad to re-review the paper in greater depth once it has be
en edited because the subject is interesting.
◆ There is continued interest in your manuscript titled "……" which you subm
itted to the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Part B - Applied Biomat
erials.
◆ The Submission has been greatly improved and is worthy of publication.
內容轉自‘海巖秋沙’的QQ空間https://blog.csdn.net/chenyusiyuan/article/details/3437577?from=singlemessage
Reviewer Comments Directed to Author(s)
1. The paper presentation requires significant improvement. In its present form, it is difficult to read it. There are many typos, grammar and syntax errors that it is very difficult to enumerate them all. For example :
(1) namely the Relative Deadline, Worst Case Execution time etc. -> namely the Relative Deadline, Worst Case Execution Time etc
(2) The Preemptions helps -> The preemptions help
(3) The Preemption threshold Scheduling (PTS) -> The preemption threshold scheduling
(4) The CPPTS algorithm provides... and The Cyclic Priority Pre- Emptive Threshold scheduling (CPPTS), -> before you define the CPPTS, we don’t know what is CPPTS. You should denote it before using.
(5) Higher priority and lower priority -> higher priority and lower priority
(6) Each Task is assigned -> Each task is assigned
(7) if the Interrupt latency goes -> if the interrupt latency goes
2. The notations or definitions is confusing or ambiguous. Such as: Let‘
例文來自網絡，侵權刪。
Reviewer 1
Detailed Comments
This paper proposes a feedback selecting method for manually acquired rules using automatic evaluation. The system uses the manually acquired rules in SBMT without building an RBMT. This approach is very interesting.
However, there are some unclear points as follows:
1. It is not clear how to the system solve the problem of ambiguity. The equivalent of the verb depends on the object. How does the system select the sentences when the several manually acquired rules which the English parts are same, can be applied to the difference sentences?
2. It is not clear how to the system applies the manually acquired rules for the long sentences. The several manually acquired rules which the English parts are different can be correctly matched to the long sentences. In that case, how does the system select the sentences?
3. In section 3.2, it is not clear whether the selected manually acquired rules change or not, by dividing evaluation corpus and manually acquired rules into several parts.
4. In Table 4, you should use other automatic evaluations, not only BLEU.
In the feedback selecting algorithm described as section 3.1, BLEU is used to select rules. Therefore, the system may suitable for BLEU. Please indicate the scores using other automatic evaluations (i.e., NIST, METEOR, ROUGE etc.).
Comment:
In section 6, this paper describes "and utilized BLEU to evaluate the translation quality and." Is this sentence right? "and" what?
Reviewer Comments Directed to Author
This paper proposes a unique automated translation system (ATS-P) that translates protein structures into musical compositions and image color combinations. The results are then evaluated through visual and auditory systems developed through biological simulations to achieve more accurate protein multiple sequences.The experimental results are good, confirming the accuracy of the proposed protein clustering method based on the selected physiological and chemical properties and the efficiency of the protein comparison strategy.
The idea of this article is relatively novel, and it proposes an automatic translation system that combines music and color. In terms of material selection, CNIH4 was chosen as a material for the study of the new strategic area of depression, making this research important medical significance.
However, this article still has some deficiencies as follows:
1.This paper is not well structured. It is difficult to follow. In the discussion section, this article explains in detail the relevant work of other researchers as well as the proposed ideas. However, this part will be better discussed in the introduction section. In the method and conclusion sections, the narrative is not detailed enough.
2. The chart format of this paper is not standardized. The interface picture in Figure 1 does not clearly show the specific information. Figure 2-10 is not suitable for typesetting, and the layout of the abscissa annotation is not beautiful. The entire chart occupies a large space.
3. The persuasiveness of the results is not sufficient. In the process of evaluation of the results, 200 participants were selected. This sample is too small. It is suggested to increase the number of samples and enhance the reliability of the results.
In summary, it is recommended that the author modify the article. Welcome to submit again.
彩蛋時刻：
1）平時可以記錄一下比較local的英文表達。
2）邊讀邊在PDF上標記你覺得好和不好的地方以及原因。
3）英語差的同學可以在寫完意見之後，用作文批改網作文批改網進行一下語法檢查，然後自己再檢查一次保證你的評審意見沒有語法錯誤哦~